Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(53,193 posts)
8. The case revolves around one point
Tue Mar 19, 2024, 04:47 PM
Mar 2024

Are illegal actions taken to overturn an election that you lost "official acts"?

No one's arguing that a lot of the stupid shit Trump did were official acts. Case in point: the deal Trump cut with the Taliban to end the Afghan War. While it was clearly the wrong way to run a railroad, it was an official act.

On the other hand, getting together a few thousand of your friends to attack the Capitol during the vote-certification process, causing slates of fake electors to be convened, making a "perfect phone call" - Trump's version of Eric Cartman singing a song about how bad he hates Kyle's mom; that never came out well - to overturn the Georgia election, or any of the other illegal things he did were NOT official acts, and can't be treated as such.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As fucked as this conservative court is, I just can't imagine that they'll grant Aristus Mar 2024 #1
I can see them granting Trump immunity in these cases AND saying it doesn't apply to Biden. ZonkerHarris Mar 2024 #3
Similar to what they did when giving Bush the presidency in 2000! slightlv Mar 2024 #9
exactly. That was what I was thinking about ZonkerHarris Mar 2024 #22
So can i bluestarone Mar 2024 #10
Agree. The malicious six will do ANYTHING to protect Trump. CousinIT Mar 2024 #11
I agree. I have zero trust in them too not kiss Donny's behind BlueKota Mar 2024 #14
Sammy the Rat will dust off BOSSHOG Mar 2024 #27
Yup republianmushroom Mar 2024 #17
Presidency has 230 years of functioning & it is co-equal not independent bucolic_frolic Mar 2024 #2
He's playing his last card. Blue Idaho Mar 2024 #4
They may not agree with the immunity argument but BlueKota Mar 2024 #15
And when he loses the election Blue Idaho Mar 2024 #20
I still think he plans on cheating somehow. BlueKota Mar 2024 #25
Aren't they already hearing this argument in a few weeks? Is this a new one? A desperate psycho. nt Evolve Dammit Mar 2024 #5
Am guessing this is all in support of that... BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #6
No immunity for traitors. Kid Berwyn Mar 2024 #7
The case revolves around one point jmowreader Mar 2024 #8
These lawyers must know they'll never get paid. intheflow Mar 2024 #12
The few of them who know what they're doing NanaCat Mar 2024 #32
All of the holders of the office before and after him didn't need immunity. SeattleVet Mar 2024 #13
The root lie there is "official acts". They were not. Period. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2024 #16
I could swear this has already been ruled on. PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2024 #18
By multiple Appeals Courts BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #19
I agree. The fact that they didn't just let the DC Circut Ruling Stand BlueKota Mar 2024 #26
Seeing as he has 6 of the 9 on the payroll I wouldn't be surprised if he wins. cstanleytech Mar 2024 #21
Too many ramifications BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #23
I still think the main goal has always been to delay the trials. BlueKota Mar 2024 #28
He can't use that to delay the state trials BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #29
The state trials give me some hope. BlueKota Mar 2024 #30
Well civil court-wise with the half a billion dollar judgement BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #31
I love my state. 🤣 BlueKota Mar 2024 #33
So, rallying a bunch of inbred thugs to... LudwigPastorius Mar 2024 #24
Supreme Court should fine Trump's slimy corrupt ass for filing a frivolous appeal. creeksneakers2 Mar 2024 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump files US Supreme Co...»Reply #8