Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

slightlv

(7,790 posts)
9. Similar to what they did when giving Bush the presidency in 2000!
Tue Mar 19, 2024, 04:51 PM
Mar 2024

They stated that was for only this case and no other cases behind or beyond this election. I always did say that sounded hinky right from the start. They appointed the president, but truly refused to take ownership of what they did.

I sure hope the same thing doesn't happen with *rump, but the thought has crossed my mind more than once, I'll have to admit. I absolutely do not trust this SCOTUS. They start from the conclusion they want, and then work backwards to make it so. If they can't find anything in law to back them up, they just make crap up. Typical R behavior!

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As fucked as this conservative court is, I just can't imagine that they'll grant Aristus Mar 2024 #1
I can see them granting Trump immunity in these cases AND saying it doesn't apply to Biden. ZonkerHarris Mar 2024 #3
Similar to what they did when giving Bush the presidency in 2000! slightlv Mar 2024 #9
exactly. That was what I was thinking about ZonkerHarris Mar 2024 #22
So can i bluestarone Mar 2024 #10
Agree. The malicious six will do ANYTHING to protect Trump. CousinIT Mar 2024 #11
I agree. I have zero trust in them too not kiss Donny's behind BlueKota Mar 2024 #14
Sammy the Rat will dust off BOSSHOG Mar 2024 #27
Yup republianmushroom Mar 2024 #17
Presidency has 230 years of functioning & it is co-equal not independent bucolic_frolic Mar 2024 #2
He's playing his last card. Blue Idaho Mar 2024 #4
They may not agree with the immunity argument but BlueKota Mar 2024 #15
And when he loses the election Blue Idaho Mar 2024 #20
I still think he plans on cheating somehow. BlueKota Mar 2024 #25
Aren't they already hearing this argument in a few weeks? Is this a new one? A desperate psycho. nt Evolve Dammit Mar 2024 #5
Am guessing this is all in support of that... BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #6
No immunity for traitors. Kid Berwyn Mar 2024 #7
The case revolves around one point jmowreader Mar 2024 #8
These lawyers must know they'll never get paid. intheflow Mar 2024 #12
The few of them who know what they're doing NanaCat Mar 2024 #32
All of the holders of the office before and after him didn't need immunity. SeattleVet Mar 2024 #13
The root lie there is "official acts". They were not. Period. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2024 #16
I could swear this has already been ruled on. PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2024 #18
By multiple Appeals Courts BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #19
I agree. The fact that they didn't just let the DC Circut Ruling Stand BlueKota Mar 2024 #26
Seeing as he has 6 of the 9 on the payroll I wouldn't be surprised if he wins. cstanleytech Mar 2024 #21
Too many ramifications BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #23
I still think the main goal has always been to delay the trials. BlueKota Mar 2024 #28
He can't use that to delay the state trials BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #29
The state trials give me some hope. BlueKota Mar 2024 #30
Well civil court-wise with the half a billion dollar judgement BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #31
I love my state. 🤣 BlueKota Mar 2024 #33
So, rallying a bunch of inbred thugs to... LudwigPastorius Mar 2024 #24
Supreme Court should fine Trump's slimy corrupt ass for filing a frivolous appeal. creeksneakers2 Mar 2024 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump files US Supreme Co...»Reply #9