Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Court agrees to block collection of Trump's massive civil fraud judgment if he puts up $175M [View all]MorbidButterflyTat
(1,880 posts)35. That makes sense
he can't borrow money for the judgment from the state he owes the judgment to!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
129 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Court agrees to block collection of Trump's massive civil fraud judgment if he puts up $175M [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Mar 25
OP
At this point in this horror show, cholesterol may be our only hope of getting rid of TSF.
OMGWTF
Mar 25
#11
Not necessarily. NY law expressly allows courts to reduce or even forego any appeals bond requirement
onenote
Mar 25
#50
He IS getting special treatment. He just bragged that he had $500 million in cash. He could have paid it.
Novara
Mar 25
#113
The majority of states have enacted statutory caps on the bond amount that a defendant can be required to pay
onenote
Mar 25
#121
Trial judges in New York city are elected. All five in this case ran as, and were elected as, Democrats.
onenote
Mar 25
#94
You are 100 percent wrong. The appellate level in NY is dominated by judges appointed by Democrats.
onenote
Mar 25
#56
The court of appeals has seven justices. All of them also were appointed by Democratic governors.
onenote
Mar 25
#112
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, yes we will delay your bond date by 10 days and reduce it by 60%+/-.
republianmushroom
Mar 25
#28
The decision was a unanimous ruling by a five judge panel of the appellate division, first deparment -- all Democrats.
onenote
Mar 25
#58
The judicial system responds meekly to intimidation. It's like watching a polar bear run away from a yappy little dog.
hay rick
Mar 25
#45
Here are the NY Court of Appeals Judges (I think/hope). Note that they've been appointed by Cuomo or Hochul.
ancianita
Mar 25
#67
It was a ruling by the appellate division, not the ct of appeals; but you're right that it was a decision by judges
onenote
Mar 25
#90
In a closed door meeting at the Federalist Society headquarters over the weekend New York appellate judges
Hotler
Mar 25
#68
So you think the five judges who made this ruling. all appointees of Democratic governors, are members of the Federalist
onenote
Mar 25
#91
It was a unanimous five judge panel of the appellate division first department, all appointees of Democratic governors
onenote
Mar 25
#89
These are the five judges you just accused of being corrupt, with absoutely no evidence beyond not liking their decision
onenote
Mar 25
#106
It is remarkable how "important" people get special treatment regardless of party, isn't it? Amerikkka in action.
PSPS
Mar 25
#102