Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(134,467 posts)
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 03:13 PM Apr 2024

Trump lawyers acknowledge civil fraud bond was issued without 'certificate of qualification' [View all]

Source: Law & Crime

Apr 16th, 2024, 9:01 am


The saga of Donald Trump’s efforts to secure a $175 million bond so he can appeal his massive civil fraud judgment continues, as attorneys on behalf of Knight Speciality Insurance Company (KSIC) and the former president have rejected the New York attorney general’s complaints about the “sufficiency of the surety to the undertaking.”

In early April, Knight and its owner Don Hankey entered the case to prevent New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) from collecting on the $454 million civil fraud judgment by seizing Trump’s properties. The bond got off to a rocky start, but once a corrected version was filed, James took “exception” to it.

On April 4, James said that the bond was issued “without a certificate of qualification pursuant to Insurance Law § 1111” and that the Trump defendants or KSIC had to file, within 10 days, documents to “justify the surety.”

In a series of Monday filings, including a memorandum, affirmations in support, and exhibits, Trump attorneys and KSIC lawyers jointly filed to say that James’ “rare” exception “should be set aside” and that her office should be on the hook for the costs “incurred” by forcing their response.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/not-the-only-evidence-of-justification-trump-lawyers-acknowledge-civil-fraud-bond-was-issued-without-certificate-of-qualification-but-say-ags-complaint-should-be-set-aside-anyway/



Full headline: ‘Not the only evidence of justification’: Trump lawyers acknowledge civil fraud bond was issued without ‘certificate of qualification’ but say AG’s complaint ‘should be set aside’ anyway
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And yet they can continue with their bullshit?.............................. Lovie777 Apr 2024 #1
meidastouch channel read from the latest and it appears that Trump pasted the security page for Demsrule86 Apr 2024 #7
Don Hankey and Don Hankey Pankey! Mme. Defarge Apr 2024 #13
So true...scumbag Don with scumbag lawyers. Demsrule86 Apr 2024 #14
So true. And today the AG asked that the court deny Trump's so called bond. Demsrule86 Apr 2024 #38
The account control has more holes moniss Apr 2024 #17
Oops! TexasBushwhacker Apr 2024 #2
That was an internet myth. former9thward Apr 2024 #27
Ah! TexasBushwhacker Apr 2024 #28
I have no idea what to make of the article. IANAL, but ai hope someone who is Raven123 Apr 2024 #3
The article downplays the fact that Trump's side has made a credible argument that the surety can be accepted onenote Apr 2024 #5
The bond is based on the backing of a Trump trust that supposedly has money and assets that can convert to money. 58Sunliner Apr 2024 #24
Sounds kind of like they simply needed a piece of paper stating that the assets actually exist to cover the judgement. cstanleytech Apr 2024 #8
So...a fraudulent bond posted for a fraud trial?! BadgerKid Apr 2024 #4
You assume that the surety's legal arguments are without merit. onenote Apr 2024 #6
My feeling would be for the surety moniss Apr 2024 #12
Do you have experience with reinsurance policies? onenote Apr 2024 #31
Yes moniss Apr 2024 #35
Great. Can you explain why isn't the reinsurance coverage from KIC is invalid? onenote Apr 2024 #36
We have no idea moniss Apr 2024 #37
Did you actually listen? Traurigkeit Apr 2024 #22
Good one. You can't make this sh*t up. n/t iluvtennis Apr 2024 #39
Brothers and sisters, let us delay. Hermit-The-Prog Apr 2024 #9
He doesn't have the money. Old Crank Apr 2024 #10
NY state law. OK did they abide by NY state law? bluestarone Apr 2024 #11
Laughable that the insurance faux bond lender "rejected" the NY AG ??!! PortTack Apr 2024 #15
Is Trump's IRS tax audit complete yet? twodogsbarking Apr 2024 #16
Two weeks. underpants Apr 2024 #26
The certification moniss Apr 2024 #18
So Trump and his lawyers filled a fraudulent document so he can appeal his guilt on running a fraudulent business? Botany Apr 2024 #19
Just seize the fucking property already. Anything and everything until you reach 500 million. onecaliberal Apr 2024 #20
I wonder how much of his and his company's properties are already leveraged to the hilt? Botany Apr 2024 #21
I'm sure all of it is. onecaliberal Apr 2024 #29
I give up. johnnyfins Apr 2024 #23
"her office should be on the hook for the costs "incurred" by forcing their response" Jarqui Apr 2024 #25
As I've stated before angrychair Apr 2024 #30
Oh shit Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2024 #32
so now they will be given another couple of weeks to provide more proof. Kablooie Apr 2024 #33
"Just say you are securing the bond, and let me and my Republican friends do the rest..." kentuck Apr 2024 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump lawyers acknowledge...