Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

former9thward

(32,738 posts)
27. That was an internet myth.
Tue Apr 16, 2024, 07:04 PM
Apr 2024

Habba had a tense interaction with the judge presiding over the lawsuit between columnist E. Jean Carroll and Trump and contested one of his rulings. But the description of a jury "box" oversight is wrong. In Trump's civil fraud case, the judge confirmed Habba did not forget to check off a box to get a jury trial.

Civil fraud case was slated for bench trial from the start

The widely circulated rumor that Habba forgot to check a box to request a jury for the trial was debunked by the judge himself, Arthur Engoron. ABC News reported on Oct. 11, 2023, that Engoron said no one “forgot” to check off anything. “We are having a non-jury trial because we are hearing a non-jury case," he said. “It would have not helped to make a motion. Nobody forgot to check off a box.”

Engoron said James had requested the case not be decided by a jury, which is reflected in court documents. That meant it would be a bench trial, which is when the judge makes the final ruling. The process to seek a jury trial instead would have required filing a motion for a jury trial, not checking a box. Trump's team filed no such motion. Even if they had, Engoron said, he would have denied it since James asked for "equitable" relief, which does not entitle participants to a jury trial.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/02/29/trump-trial-alina-habba-jury-box/72780822007/

And yet they can continue with their bullshit?.............................. Lovie777 Apr 2024 #1
meidastouch channel read from the latest and it appears that Trump pasted the security page for Demsrule86 Apr 2024 #7
Don Hankey and Don Hankey Pankey! Mme. Defarge Apr 2024 #13
So true...scumbag Don with scumbag lawyers. Demsrule86 Apr 2024 #14
So true. And today the AG asked that the court deny Trump's so called bond. Demsrule86 Apr 2024 #38
The account control has more holes moniss Apr 2024 #17
Oops! TexasBushwhacker Apr 2024 #2
That was an internet myth. former9thward Apr 2024 #27
Ah! TexasBushwhacker Apr 2024 #28
I have no idea what to make of the article. IANAL, but ai hope someone who is Raven123 Apr 2024 #3
The article downplays the fact that Trump's side has made a credible argument that the surety can be accepted onenote Apr 2024 #5
The bond is based on the backing of a Trump trust that supposedly has money and assets that can convert to money. 58Sunliner Apr 2024 #24
Sounds kind of like they simply needed a piece of paper stating that the assets actually exist to cover the judgement. cstanleytech Apr 2024 #8
So...a fraudulent bond posted for a fraud trial?! BadgerKid Apr 2024 #4
You assume that the surety's legal arguments are without merit. onenote Apr 2024 #6
My feeling would be for the surety moniss Apr 2024 #12
Do you have experience with reinsurance policies? onenote Apr 2024 #31
Yes moniss Apr 2024 #35
Great. Can you explain why isn't the reinsurance coverage from KIC is invalid? onenote Apr 2024 #36
We have no idea moniss Apr 2024 #37
Did you actually listen? Traurigkeit Apr 2024 #22
Good one. You can't make this sh*t up. n/t iluvtennis Apr 2024 #39
Brothers and sisters, let us delay. Hermit-The-Prog Apr 2024 #9
He doesn't have the money. Old Crank Apr 2024 #10
NY state law. OK did they abide by NY state law? bluestarone Apr 2024 #11
Laughable that the insurance faux bond lender "rejected" the NY AG ??!! PortTack Apr 2024 #15
Is Trump's IRS tax audit complete yet? twodogsbarking Apr 2024 #16
Two weeks. underpants Apr 2024 #26
The certification moniss Apr 2024 #18
So Trump and his lawyers filled a fraudulent document so he can appeal his guilt on running a fraudulent business? Botany Apr 2024 #19
Just seize the fucking property already. Anything and everything until you reach 500 million. onecaliberal Apr 2024 #20
I wonder how much of his and his company's properties are already leveraged to the hilt? Botany Apr 2024 #21
I'm sure all of it is. onecaliberal Apr 2024 #29
I give up. johnnyfins Apr 2024 #23
"her office should be on the hook for the costs "incurred" by forcing their response" Jarqui Apr 2024 #25
As I've stated before angrychair Apr 2024 #30
Oh shit Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2024 #32
so now they will be given another couple of weeks to provide more proof. Kablooie Apr 2024 #33
"Just say you are securing the bond, and let me and my Republican friends do the rest..." kentuck Apr 2024 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump lawyers acknowledge...»Reply #27