Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

TomCADem

(17,837 posts)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 01:53 AM Dec 2012

Top Conservative Author Endorses ‘Benevolent Sexism’ [View all]

Source: Think Progress

Charles Murray, a scholar at the leading conservative think tank the American Enterprise Institute, may be the most influential populizer of racist views in the country. His book The Bell Curve, which posits that black people are genetically less intelligent than whites, practically spawned an entire field of scholarship devoted to debunking it. His most recent book, Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010 even made an appearance on the campaign trial during the recent presidential election.

Murray, however, appears to have set aside his retrograde views about race in order to tout equally backwards views about gender. In a short piece on AEI’s website, Murray recently suggested that “benevolent sexism” might be “healthy.” The only problem is that he appears not to have read the research on which he bases this extraordinary conclusion, which cited strong evidence that “benevolent sexism” was itself linked to discrimination against women and rape victims.

The paper in question, by Kathleen Connelly and Martin Heesacker, studies why “benevolent sexism,” understood as “an ostensibly flattering ideology that idealizes women who conform to feminine norms,” is so commonly accepted by men and women around the world. The authors find that “although benevolent sexism perpetuates inequality at the structural level, it might offer some benefits at the personal level” by giving men and women a sense of order and structure in their lives.

Though the authors see this as a concern, given that so-called benevolent sexism is net-destructive for women, but Murray believes this is knee-jerk liberal prejudice. “When social scientists discover something that increases life satisfaction for both sexes, shouldn’t they at least consider the possibility that they have come across something that is positive? Healthy” he asks rhetorically. “Something that might even conceivably be grounded in the nature of Homo sapiens?”


Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/12/01/1262431/top-conservative-author-endorses-benevolent-sexism/



From the same Conservative Thinker who used standardized test scores to argue that African Americans are genetically less intelligent than White people, comes a new theory that uses a similar approach to justify sexism toward women. I guess we can expect the House Republicans to roll out this research to explain why they only have one woman committee chair! Its "benevolent sexism!"
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Benevolent sexism? SheilaT Dec 2012 #1
Sort of like mimi85 Dec 2012 #7
I know that there are a lot of different versions of this, but: ashling Dec 2012 #9
Still a good one! randome Dec 2012 #29
and, of course, 'benign neglect' Berlum Dec 2012 #13
Kinda like Murray's "benevolent racism." What a creep. He should be denounced and ostracized chimpymustgo Dec 2012 #21
Likely because it has the word "sexism" on it. AAO Dec 2012 #35
Murray would be so happy living in Stepford. Smilo Dec 2012 #2
They want us to think the calender says 1956... Left Coast2020 Dec 2012 #3
more like 1856 vlyons Dec 2012 #19
Sounds like the twin of.... luv_mykatz Dec 2012 #4
all compassionate conservatism ever did vlyons Dec 2012 #20
Run-of-the-mill DU poster endorses Murray going to 'fuck himself.' nt Deep13 Dec 2012 #5
"In a short piece on AEI’s website..." SoapBox Dec 2012 #6
Seems like he is trying to contrive authority behind the social expectations that he has developed.. 4saken Dec 2012 #8
"by giving men and women a sense of order and structure in their lives..." bhikkhu Dec 2012 #10
+1 freshwest Dec 2012 #15
There is plenty of order and structure in N Korea Chemisse Dec 2012 #17
Itr would be accurate if not so generalized AAO Dec 2012 #36
It's Condescending Assism. n/t jtuck004 Dec 2012 #11
I couldn't get past "...which posits that black people are genetically less intelligent than whites" Skittles Dec 2012 #12
What a fucking idiot. blackspade Dec 2012 #14
I can just imagine the Republicans embracing this Jack Rabbit Dec 2012 #16
In response, women across the country endorse "Benevolent Kicking-Murray-In-The-Ballsism". Ken Burch Dec 2012 #18
"Benevolent Kicking-Murray-In-The-Ballsism" AlbertCat Dec 2012 #30
The election is over and the same ideology that brought us 'rapenade' is still going strong? ck4829 Dec 2012 #22
Think Tank denisens can hardly be considered "scholars" mulsh Dec 2012 #23
I met him once. naaman fletcher Dec 2012 #24
"He ordered a double whiskey with a beer chaser. Twice." bemildred Dec 2012 #31
What's especially interesting about this is that the vast majority of SheilaT Dec 2012 #34
yeah heaven05 Dec 2012 #25
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #26
They are doubling down on the stupid! Odin2005 Dec 2012 #27
C'mon, the GOP is just trying to protect women from breaking a nail!! Beartracks Dec 2012 #28
facepalm.... mike_c Dec 2012 #32
Oh, FFS. ElboRuum Dec 2012 #33
Fuck you Murray Zoeisright Dec 2012 #37
+1 hrmjustin Dec 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Top Conservative Author E...