Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LeftInTX

(34,885 posts)
38. It's from GedMatch. It's DNA markers and what modern populations the DNA matches with.
Fri May 3, 2024, 05:37 AM
May 2024

Sort of a past time I have
It's not where the person has been. It's how it matches with living populations.

Here is a partial list of ancient DNA samples


You select a kit and put it in a calculator
There are about five Neanderthals on the list:


Here are my DNA results


Here is my Oracle
It's pretty accurate: I'm 1/2 Armenian and 1/2 Mostly British Isles..

Keep in mind admixtures are estimates. It's saying based on the Eurogene calculator, I am most like this populations. The 2.1 is accuracy. The smaller the number, the closer the match.
There are numerous calculators on GedMatch and results each vary slightly.



Here is the Oracle for the Neanderthal:


All of the Neanderthals are primarily African. I find it very interesting.
You can run all the ancient DNA samples. It's fun! I can also run the DNA of any kit number.

Here is a relative who is 100% Armenian


Admixture is not 100% accurate. However, the fact that all the Neanderthals are mostly Sub-saharan African (SSA) in their admixtures, indicates that genetically, they were mostly Sub-saharan African with some North East African. However, admixture does not equal appearance. They may have been SSA, but their features may have changed due to adaptation to cold climate.

Lots of modern people carry traces from other continents of which they have no connection with. So small percentages are quite common. Lots of my matches are like 1% SSA or 1% South Asian. 1% Oceanic is also common. So is !-2% NA, with Eastern Europeans.

I'm in a FB Group and that's what we do!

Oh and the Doe DNA Project uses GedMatch. They are volunteers and some of their work is shared publicly. Here is their spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O2GYCflA5CpOWkp-XBHaExE6_ocVNbJN/edit#gid=82211262





Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She looks great for her age! nt intrepidity May 2024 #1
Granny! Arne May 2024 #2
There's a congressional district in Georgia where Mr.Bill May 2024 #3
OMG I see the similarity! Maraya1969 May 2024 #4
You have a good eye! LOL LeftInTX May 2024 #5
Ouch. GB_RN May 2024 #7
+1 orangecrush May 2024 #9
Same here. Definitely. calimary May 2024 #15
I think she is better looing than the one in Georgia Bev54 May 2024 #11
Probably more intelligent, too. n/t Mr.Bill May 2024 #12
+1 dalton99a May 2024 #18
That is a sick and disgusting comment. She was a person. Show a little respect. Martin68 May 2024 #25
That brow, chin and smile, multigraincracker May 2024 #6
No one has ever lived at any time other than the most modern of times sanatanadharma May 2024 #8
Not to confuse the packaging with the package. WheelWalker May 2024 #32
She lived StarryNite May 2024 #10
Is that MGT without the blonde hair? Chainfire May 2024 #13
Enough with the juvenile jokes. This was a real person. Stop demeaning yourself and the scientists and artists who Martin68 May 2024 #26
Exactly! usaf-vet May 2024 #28
I'm sure this particular lady Aussie105 May 2024 #36
I care. I'm not going to second guess highly rained forensic anthropologists. Martin68 May 2024 #43
Where did it say her age? Polybius May 2024 #45
What is your point? Facial reconstruction its based on bone structure, not age. Jus because she looks old to your eyes, Martin68 May 2024 #47
My point is that i was responding to the other poster Polybius May 2024 #49
Yes, that's very ok. I'm sorry if I came across as unpleasant. The comments about age and flippant quips about the woman Martin68 May 2024 #51
It's all good! Polybius May 2024 #53
No, that image is an artist conception of what this protohuman may have looked like. It is a fantasy. Chainfire May 2024 #42
Her sex was determined by DNA from her tooth enamel. Bone structure is fairly straight forward. LeftInTX May 2024 #46
now use ai to de-age catsudon May 2024 #14
There are better pictures Warpy May 2024 #16
23 and thee. Marcuse May 2024 #17
No eyebrows or did she pluck them? twodogsbarking May 2024 #19
MTG ananda May 2024 #20
Seriously now, that (and I may be in trouble for saying it) is a Native American face. mpcamb May 2024 #21
No, it is not a Native American face. It is a Neanderthal face. The differences are quite obvious. Martin68 May 2024 #24
neat. AllaN01Bear May 2024 #22
Will posters please stop the agist, misogynistic, and foolish comments on how good she looks for her age? The article Martin68 May 2024 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Elessar Zappa May 2024 #44
Wow. Science has brought us wonderful insight into our pass. Now 75,000-year-old Neanderthal woman. That doesn't ..... usaf-vet May 2024 #27
Get thee behind me SATAN! brooklynite May 2024 #30
MJT is older than we thought relayerbob May 2024 #29
I'm watching the documentary on Netflix. LeftInTX May 2024 #31
I don't understand what that pie chart is trying to tell us muriel_volestrangler May 2024 #33
Wrong interpretation. Aussie105 May 2024 #35
Your sentence "Current Baltic genotype has some Neanderthal commonality" may be true muriel_volestrangler May 2024 #37
It's cool! Right! LeftInTX May 2024 #39
It's from GedMatch. It's DNA markers and what modern populations the DNA matches with. LeftInTX May 2024 #38
It's meaningless for the Neanderthal muriel_volestrangler May 2024 #41
I was going to say there is a lot of guess work involved. Aussie105 May 2024 #34
What's weird is: Neanderthals carried mostly African genes, but modern Africans do not carry the Neanderthal genes. LeftInTX May 2024 #40
I think there's been a tendency to assume snot May 2024 #48
Homo sapiens prevailed? Aussie105 May 2024 #50
My understanding is that only ca. 2% snot May 2024 #54
An apex predator John Shaft May 2024 #52
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Face of a 75,000-year-old...»Reply #38