Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snot

(11,623 posts)
48. I think there's been a tendency to assume
Fri May 3, 2024, 12:32 PM
May 2024

...that because Homo Sapiens prevailed, they must have been smarter or better; but I've sometimes wondered whether they might just have been more sociopathic.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She looks great for her age! nt intrepidity May 2024 #1
Granny! Arne May 2024 #2
There's a congressional district in Georgia where Mr.Bill May 2024 #3
OMG I see the similarity! Maraya1969 May 2024 #4
You have a good eye! LOL LeftInTX May 2024 #5
Ouch. GB_RN May 2024 #7
+1 orangecrush May 2024 #9
Same here. Definitely. calimary May 2024 #15
I think she is better looing than the one in Georgia Bev54 May 2024 #11
Probably more intelligent, too. n/t Mr.Bill May 2024 #12
+1 dalton99a May 2024 #18
That is a sick and disgusting comment. She was a person. Show a little respect. Martin68 May 2024 #25
That brow, chin and smile, multigraincracker May 2024 #6
No one has ever lived at any time other than the most modern of times sanatanadharma May 2024 #8
Not to confuse the packaging with the package. WheelWalker May 2024 #32
She lived StarryNite May 2024 #10
Is that MGT without the blonde hair? Chainfire May 2024 #13
Enough with the juvenile jokes. This was a real person. Stop demeaning yourself and the scientists and artists who Martin68 May 2024 #26
Exactly! usaf-vet May 2024 #28
I'm sure this particular lady Aussie105 May 2024 #36
I care. I'm not going to second guess highly rained forensic anthropologists. Martin68 May 2024 #43
Where did it say her age? Polybius May 2024 #45
What is your point? Facial reconstruction its based on bone structure, not age. Jus because she looks old to your eyes, Martin68 May 2024 #47
My point is that i was responding to the other poster Polybius May 2024 #49
Yes, that's very ok. I'm sorry if I came across as unpleasant. The comments about age and flippant quips about the woman Martin68 May 2024 #51
It's all good! Polybius May 2024 #53
No, that image is an artist conception of what this protohuman may have looked like. It is a fantasy. Chainfire May 2024 #42
Her sex was determined by DNA from her tooth enamel. Bone structure is fairly straight forward. LeftInTX May 2024 #46
now use ai to de-age catsudon May 2024 #14
There are better pictures Warpy May 2024 #16
23 and thee. Marcuse May 2024 #17
No eyebrows or did she pluck them? twodogsbarking May 2024 #19
MTG ananda May 2024 #20
Seriously now, that (and I may be in trouble for saying it) is a Native American face. mpcamb May 2024 #21
No, it is not a Native American face. It is a Neanderthal face. The differences are quite obvious. Martin68 May 2024 #24
neat. AllaN01Bear May 2024 #22
Will posters please stop the agist, misogynistic, and foolish comments on how good she looks for her age? The article Martin68 May 2024 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Elessar Zappa May 2024 #44
Wow. Science has brought us wonderful insight into our pass. Now 75,000-year-old Neanderthal woman. That doesn't ..... usaf-vet May 2024 #27
Get thee behind me SATAN! brooklynite May 2024 #30
MJT is older than we thought relayerbob May 2024 #29
I'm watching the documentary on Netflix. LeftInTX May 2024 #31
I don't understand what that pie chart is trying to tell us muriel_volestrangler May 2024 #33
Wrong interpretation. Aussie105 May 2024 #35
Your sentence "Current Baltic genotype has some Neanderthal commonality" may be true muriel_volestrangler May 2024 #37
It's cool! Right! LeftInTX May 2024 #39
It's from GedMatch. It's DNA markers and what modern populations the DNA matches with. LeftInTX May 2024 #38
It's meaningless for the Neanderthal muriel_volestrangler May 2024 #41
I was going to say there is a lot of guess work involved. Aussie105 May 2024 #34
What's weird is: Neanderthals carried mostly African genes, but modern Africans do not carry the Neanderthal genes. LeftInTX May 2024 #40
I think there's been a tendency to assume snot May 2024 #48
Homo sapiens prevailed? Aussie105 May 2024 #50
My understanding is that only ca. 2% snot May 2024 #54
An apex predator John Shaft May 2024 #52
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Face of a 75,000-year-old...»Reply #48