Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Warpy

(114,746 posts)

17. I doubt if he ever onsidered asking her

Reply to FakeNoose (Reply #16)

Tue May 7, 2024, 07:30 PM

May 2024

She was just a thing to be used while his wife was indisposed, maybe something on his bucket list, who knows? She;'s very clear that she felt the situation was such that she couldn't say no.

I don't suppose she expected to enjoy it, it was just another job.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump loses bid for mistrial in hush money case [View all] BumRushDaShow May 2024 OP

His lawyers are saying that Daniels' testimony will prejudice the jury against him birdographer May 2024 #1

Agree republianmushroom May 2024 #5

Good one!! AZ8theist May 2024 #10

This worries me somewhat. Even if there is no mistrial declared, you can bet generalbetrayus May 2024 #7

I agree with you Raven123 May 2024 #8

ABC: Judge denies motion for mistrial after Stormy Daniels alleged sexual encounter testimony riversedge May 2024 #2

They were desperately hoping for a mistrial -- "no objection coming from the defense". Hermit-The-Prog May 2024 #4

Trump was AWAKE today: "Trump was furiously writing notes and passing them to Blanche during Daniels testimony."....... riversedge May 2024 #9

Ha ha, my first thought as well: oh, he stayed awake today! crickets May 2024 #11

Just as long as her testimony Blue Idaho May 2024 #3

I think it's posturing to maintain unity in the caucus ColinC May 2024 #6

IF he never had sex with her, one note would have been more than enough. world wide wally May 2024 #12

Chump is such a cheap bastard, he never would have paid her if it hadn't happened FakeNoose May 2024 #15

I think it was a misatake allowing her to elaborate on anything Warpy May 2024 #13

They made it clear that only one person enjoyed the encounter FakeNoose May 2024 #16

I doubt if he ever onsidered asking her Warpy May 2024 #17

I think the details actually give her more credibility as a witness Bayard May 2024 #14

"Your Honor, the jury is now biased against my micro-penis and inability to last more than 2 minutes in bed!" Tarc May 2024 #18

Grasp at every straw you can oasis May 2024 #19