Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

LisaM

(28,049 posts)

2. I don't agree with the term limit part.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sat May 18, 2024, 11:31 PM

May 18

However, on the question of ethics and recusal, I am totally on board.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nadler questions Supreme Court ethics after Alito flag debacle: 'None of them have clean hands' [View all] BumRushDaShow May 18 OP

Things like this happen because the court has no code of ethics that the Justices must adhere to. patphil May 18 #1

I don't agree with the term limit part. LisaM May 18 #2

Yeah, the lifetime term is there for a good reason but ... PSPS May 19 #3

Right. In Michigan, term limits means doing the bidding of donors to ensure your future career Novara May 19 #7

In saying "none of them" BaronChocula May 19 #4

My question too. eom BlueMTexpat May 19 #5

great question nt orleans May 19 #11

"Aww come on, everyone. We've all been married truthisfreedom May 19 #6

it appears he has been complicit et tu May 19 #8

It's such a stark contrast between the outstanding, conscientious justices Brown Jackson, Mysterian May 19 #9

I question the contention that "none of them have clean hands." Martin68 May 19 #10

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Nadler questions Supreme ...»Reply #2