Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(171,102 posts)
Thu May 30, 2024, 10:28 AM May 2024

Supreme Court sides with NRA in free speech ruling that curbs government pressure campaigns [View all]

Source: CNN Politics

Updated 10:28 AM EDT, Thu May 30, 2024


CNN — The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously backed the National Rifle Association in a First Amendment ruling that could make it harder for state regulators to pressure advocacy groups.

The decision means the NRA may continue to pursue its lawsuit against a New York official who urged banks and insurance companies to cut ties with the gun rights group following the 2018 mass shooting at a Parkland, Florida, high school that left 17 people dead. “Ultimately, the critical takeaway is that the First Amendment prohibits government officials from wielding their power selectively to punish or suppress speech, directly or (as alleged here) through private intermediaries,” the opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor said.

The NRA claimed that Maria Vullo, the former superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services, not only leaned on insurance companies to part ways with the gun lobby but threatened enforcement actions against those firms if they failed to comply.

At the center of the dispute was a meeting Vullo had with insurance market Lloyd’s of London in 2018 in which the NRA claims she offered to not prosecute other violations as long as the company helped with the campaign against gun groups. Vullo tried to wave off the significance of the meeting, arguing in part that the NRA’s allegations of what took place were not specific.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/30/politics/supreme-court-first-amendment/index.html



Was monitoring on SCOTUSBlog and they apparently remanded back to the lower courts to further review.

Article updated.

Original article -

Published 10:12 AM EDT, Thu May 30, 2024


CNN — The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously backed the National Rifle Association in a First Amendment ruling that could make it harder for state regulators to pressure advocacy groups.

The decision means the NRA may continue to pursue its lawsuit against a New York official who urged banks and insurance companies to cut ties with the gun rights group following the 2018 mass shooting at a Parkland, Florida, high school that left 17 people dead.

This story is breaking and will be updated.
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So the supreme court is still circling the sewer drain. BComplex May 2024 #1
In all fairness, it was a 9-0 ruling. Not stating that I agree or not with ruling, just pointing out. toesonthenose May 2024 #2
WTF? Why would the democratically appointed justices agree to that? BComplex May 2024 #3
Sotomayor wrote the majority opinion unblock May 2024 #5
However, if it were Republican government regulators pressuring organizations to drop ties with hadEnuf May 2024 #9
But the NRA is a terrorist organization, it supports the slaughter of innocent Americans. Irish_Dem May 2024 #10
I agree, but it has not been designated as such unblock May 2024 #25
Many issues of morality are not legally labeled. Irish_Dem May 2024 #26
Red state government oppression against lefty causes would have skyrocketed otherwise. unblock May 2024 #28
They could have easily made this point with another case. Irish_Dem May 2024 #30
I think that this is a good point. markodochartaigh May 2024 #33
The purpose of the court isn't to do what's best for people Groundhawg May 2024 #41
The Constitution exists protect us from folks like that official, and yourself. tritsofme May 2024 #49
You should read the decision. Dr. Strange May 2024 #7
The NRA is dangerous, it is not a matter of genteel disagreement. Irish_Dem May 2024 #11
Because speech that you don't like should still be free Polybius May 2024 #16
Because "NRA Evil... We must vote against them regardless of the law or circumstances"... FBaggins May 2024 #22
Unfortunately it's the correct ruling as it could open s Pandora's box of problems. cstanleytech May 2024 #15
The Russian funded NRA Walleye May 2024 #4
Exactly, Putin found a way to help murder innocent Americans. Irish_Dem May 2024 #13
Gun violence is the leading cause in older teens but not children EX500rider May 2024 #31
This is not correct. Currently, the leading cause of death for children 1-19yrs is gun violence. Irish_Dem May 2024 #44
It is correct EX500rider May 2024 #45
I will go with NIH, CDC, New England Journal of Medicine, and President Joe Biden. Irish_Dem May 2024 #46
Sure, if you pretend 19yo gang bangers shooting each other are "children" EX500rider May 2024 #48
Not even top 10 sarisataka May 2024 #32
Judicial Bribes intelpug May 2024 #47
Regardless of our feelings about NRA, this is good cactusfractal May 2024 #6
The Supreme Court has blood on its hands. Irish_Dem May 2024 #8
9-0 n/t Polybius May 2024 #17
Makes it more disgusting. Irish_Dem May 2024 #18
Makes ya wanna read the ruling Polybius May 2024 #21
I read it. Irish_Dem May 2024 #24
I want 'em to toss out the 1934 and 1968 gun control acts. The Mouth May 2024 #12
This can cut both ways, as it should also apply to red state officials coming after ESG and the like. Eugene May 2024 #14
Could this effect how Congress has been blocking funding to things like Planned Parenthood? cstanleytech May 2024 #19
What about when Ron DeFascist removes 2 elected prosecutors... CaptainTruth May 2024 #20
Correct ruling despite the appellant. sarisataka May 2024 #23
It is a moral good to go after the Putin funded NRA. Irish_Dem May 2024 #27
So you ignore the Constitution TexasDem69 May 2024 #40
So this ruling says - walkingman May 2024 #29
Has the Texas law been challenged? Has it been upheld by the Supreme Court? onenote May 2024 #36
It appear that it was challenged by the ACLU and deemed OK? walkingman May 2024 #43
Since the NRA tries to force guns into institutions, NRA should be forced to have guns at its meetings too! GreenWave May 2024 #34
The ACLU provided the attorney that argued the case on behalf of the NRA onenote May 2024 #35
ACLU is not always on our side. Not everyone realizes this. LeftInTX May 2024 #37
"Our side" always should be on the side of the first amendment. onenote May 2024 #38
Outstanding! TexasDem69 May 2024 #39
People need to stop thinking this is about the NRA jgmiller May 2024 #42
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court sides with ...