Latest Breaking News

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)

28. Sure. But Loose Cannon has been reversed twice in this case already, if my recollection is good. . . . nt

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #23)

Mon Jun 3, 2024, 06:11 AM

Jun 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal judge shoots down 'orchestrated campaign' to remove Trump-appointed judge in classified documents case [View all] riversedge Jun 2024 OP

They protect their own ilovegamers43 Jun 2024 #1

The fix is in. Irish_Dem Jun 2024 #2

Yes. BlueKota Jun 2024 #54

Bet we will know about this Judge William Pryor soon. OAITW r.2.0 Jun 2024 #3

"Complaints"... appmanga Jun 2024 #4

Welcome to DU orangecrush Jun 2024 #37

An appeal to the next level. This ain't over. marble falls Jun 2024 #5

What is the "next level"? onenote Jun 2024 #7

Here's what I'm thinking... agingdem Jun 2024 #57

It won't matter anyway when the right wingers on the supreme court hand trump immunity mucifer Jun 2024 #6

They can't. Due to someone else being President right now. Traurigkeit Jun 2024 #13

They'll find a way to make it apply only to Trump. NYC Liberal Jun 2024 #15

That will give a template for Dark Brandon Traurigkeit Jun 2024 #17

I know I shouldn't say I told you so, but -- I told you so. onenote Jun 2024 #8

A public campaign of complaints is different from a judge's third reversed error, which might yet occur. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2024 #9

Not by much FBaggins Jun 2024 #23

Sure. But Loose Cannon has been reversed twice in this case already, if my recollection is good. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2024 #28

There is no "three strikes and your out" rule for judges. onenote Jun 2024 #35

It's not a rule, and no precise tipping point. Not even Cannon knows, but she knows she's on thin ice in this case. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2024 #39

That's wishful thinking I'm afraid FBaggins Jun 2024 #41

You are more likely right than not. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2024 #43

Bush lite appointee from 2005. AZLD4Candidate Jun 2024 #10

As it should with these "orchestrated campaigns" PSPS Jun 2024 #11

The Wikipedia Page On Pryor (He Is A Real Doozy) DallasNE Jun 2024 #12

JFC. Thank you for posting this. I am going to go throw up now. niyad Jun 2024 #16

Jeebus orangecrush Jun 2024 #38

Oh, brother. As if it's not obvious what Loose Cannon is doing. brush Jun 2024 #14

Looks like the whole circuit is in on the fix. slightlv Jun 2024 #18

Or maybe the 11th circuit likes following its rules. onenote Jun 2024 #51

This is in response to complaints from a public write-in campaign, Qutzupalotl Jun 2024 #19

Same...it just has to be a majority on an appeal like this right? Not every single judge? PortTack Jun 2024 #20

Yes... but it's a fairly red circuit and he's the chief FBaggins Jun 2024 #24

I'm not surprised that didn't work. ShazzieB Jun 2024 #21

My appreciation to those involved in this so-called orchestrated campaign BaronChocula Jun 2024 #22

So called? FBaggins Jun 2024 #26

The participants in this orchestrated campaign were misled by Glenn Kirschner. onenote Jun 2024 #31

It wouldn't be the first time FBaggins Jun 2024 #34

That in no way is a legitimate reason to turn it down rather they should be looking at the facts of the complaint itself. cstanleytech Jun 2024 #25

So you expect the court to ignore the clearly stated rules regarding such complaints? onenote Jun 2024 #50

Why should orchestrating invalidate legitimate facts? cstanleytech Jun 2024 #59

You miss the point. The rule is intended to save the court from having to process and consider duplicative complaints. onenote Jun 2024 #60

Ahh so essentially it's that it's a duplicate of something else that is already been filed or that was already decided. cstanleytech Jun 2024 #61

Pryor. I should have known. no_hypocrisy Jun 2024 #27

The source is "Fox News". "msn" is just the aggregator. nt sl8 Jun 2024 #29

So? FBaggins Jun 2024 #40

That's fine, but it's still incorrect to identify the source as "msn". sl8 Jun 2024 #42

I always thought that you had to put down whatever the link says Polybius Jun 2024 #46

Why do you think that? sl8 Jun 2024 #53

The courts and the judgeships are the right's firewall against the rule of law and the majority. Botany Jun 2024 #30

"Judge Aileen Cannon was the target of more than 1,000 complaints in a single week last month" Novara Jun 2024 #32

I wonder if anyone actually wants to read the judge's order before commenting. onenote Jun 2024 #33

wow rw extremists can scream and yell et tu Jun 2024 #36

Another Maga EllenD Jun 2024 #44

More like a Baga Polybius Jun 2024 #47

What part of his ruling is inconsistent with the clearly stated rules regarding petitions alleging misconduct? onenote Jun 2024 #48

And the DOJ filed the case in Florida because there may have been delays in DC. republianmushroom Jun 2024 #45

Every one of the counts in the indictment has a nexus to Florida onenote Jun 2024 #49

Sshhh, don't spoil the anti-Garland crowd's indignation AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2024 #52

And for the Garland cheer leaders republianmushroom Jun 2024 #58

Dub post republianmushroom Jun 2024 #62

Rulings highlight how Trump's classified documents case could have gone differently republianmushroom Jun 2024 #63

This message was self-deleted by its author Scrivener7 Jun 2024 #55

As long as Smith still has a right to ask to get her BlueKota Jun 2024 #56