Latest Breaking News

LeftInTX

(34,207 posts)

45. Ah.......

Thu Jun 13, 2024, 11:49 AM

Jun 2024

Bet it was, Kazmarack, (sic), 5th Ct of Appeals, crazy poorly written, etc...???

Maybe the plaintiffs didn't have standing. (Haven't read the case. On my way out today)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

diane in sf

95 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Upholds Full Access to Mifepristone Abortion Pill [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2024 OP

Hallelujah ! sinkingfeeling Jun 2024 #1

What,.. did Chief Justice Roberts make Alito gulp down a clump of dog shit ? magicarpet Jun 2024 #60

Don't forget his harridan wifey wolfie001 Jun 2024 #65

BREAKING: Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill. LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #2

My laptop was moving slow trying to post BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #3

SCOTUSblog had the story out, but no one had it online yet. mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2024 #5

Yup but I did get an alert on the iPad from AP first BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #9

I was trying CNN, CNBC, and Google News. mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2024 #12

I think the Bloombergs give you a "free" view or two before they paywall BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #21

Absolutely. All this means is the current extremist arguments do not hold. It leaves open that JohnSJ Jun 2024 #32

We are definitely standing on a precipice, no doubt. BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #39

Sure, but this ruling also doesn't stop individual states from banning it I JohnSJ Jun 2024 #52

That might be challenged BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #54

yes, it is far from over JohnSJ Jun 2024 #55

Exactly DENVERPOPS Jun 2024 #75

Ah....... LeftInTX Jun 2024 #45

They absolutely didn't have standing. ShazzieB Jun 2024 #90

Agree Biglinda 52 Jun 2024 #95

I smell a rat. lark Jun 2024 #4

Exactly. If Donny wins they will do whatever their BlueKota Jun 2024 #8

And, in doing that, he'll make sure to profit from it! BComplex Jun 2024 #70

No he doesn't BlueKota Jun 2024 #71

But MOMFUDSKI Jun 2024 #13

Gotta throw a blanket on the celebrations though AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2024 #19

We're Democrats. We learn from history. Scrivener7 Jun 2024 #33

Can we move to cautiously optimistic? nt Shermann Jun 2024 #51

Does history teach you to do that? You be you. Scrivener7 Jun 2024 #68

when it comes to the current scotus quakerboy Jun 2024 #84

Yes, as my husband just reminded me, this is good news for today. lark Jun 2024 #27

I was about to post the same thing. There is a big catch somewhere. Irish_Dem Jun 2024 #53

Can't wait to read the ruling! MissMillie Jun 2024 #6

It was a unanimous decision. mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2024 #14

That's right. I just read too quickly. MissMillie Jun 2024 #17

Understandably. The story is moving pretty quickly. Lots to digest all at once. mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2024 #18

Sounds like it's the Thomas concurrence that needs a close reading, IMO ms liberty Jun 2024 #31

I gave it a skim and it's...what you'd expect it to be. sir pball Jun 2024 #46

This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2024 #15

The plaintiffs in the Mifepristone case lack standing, the Supreme Court rules. LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #7

Supreme Court rejects mifepristone abortion pill challenge on standing grounds LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #10

Danco Laboratories - manufacturers of Mifeprex FakeNoose Jun 2024 #11

So basically ScratchCat Jun 2024 #16

I think that's right Unwind Your Mind Jun 2024 #24

If the SCOTUS had ruled with that appeals court BumRushDaShow Jun 2024 #26

ONLY because the doctors did not have standing Novara Jun 2024 #20

Most cases from Kacsmaryk (sic?) and 5th Court of Appeals are BS. LeftInTX Jun 2024 #47

Yep. The courts are on the ballot this November. Novara Jun 2024 #56

it will be hard to GET "standing". Approved drugs have side effects that are listed oldsoftie Jun 2024 #59

True. But they're not done. Novara Jun 2024 #63

I hope women's rights supporters outnumber the inflation/border voters. oldsoftie Jun 2024 #74

Pissed off women are not going away any time soon. Novara Jun 2024 #77

Comstock act slightlv Jun 2024 #86

I agree. That's what they're going for. Novara Jun 2024 #92

I guess we can say they're progressing? slightlv Jun 2024 #93

After the election, the Right will find someone with a more solid standing claim Tom Rinaldo Jun 2024 #22

As their opinion points out, the plaintiffs had no standing. They never should have agreed to accept the case. PSPS Jun 2024 #23

Who is "they"? onenote Jun 2024 #25

Except the SC could have stated that they had NO STANDING and bluestarone Jun 2024 #80

They needed to grant cert. Otherwise they couldn't do anything. onenote Jun 2024 #91

Those doctors need to be blackballed LiberalFighter Jun 2024 #28

yes; what ELSE are they against? "First, do no harm..." nt oldsoftie Jun 2024 #61

Huh, I guess amy conan watzername... Think. Again. Jun 2024 #29

I don't remember people being so negative when the Court rejected the Texas election challenge on standing onenote Jun 2024 #30

Because it isn't a win, it is just a reprieve. No one should forget what they did with Dobbs. Different arguments, JohnSJ Jun 2024 #35

Make no mistake about it, all this is, is a reprieve. A republican congress and trump in the WH can undo it in a JohnSJ Jun 2024 #34

There wont/wouldnt be a big enough majority to pass. Especially in the Senate. oldsoftie Jun 2024 #62

All they would need to do is get rid of the filibuster, or a trump presidency doing an executive order. JohnSJ Jun 2024 #64

I think even THIS Court would balk at an EO. They've done it before on less. oldsoftie Jun 2024 #73

Getting rid of the filibuster would be up to the Senate republicans, not the SC, and the fact that they removed the JohnSJ Jun 2024 #76

"....didn't have standing," right? jaxexpat Jun 2024 #36

Two lower courts had held the doctors had standing. So if the court really wanted to find standing, they could have onenote Jun 2024 #40

It is a curious thing, our USSC. jaxexpat Jun 2024 #44

Check their stock portfolios. usonian Jun 2024 #37

147 republicans in Congress begged the court to ban the drug and told women to go to hell. LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #38

Supreme failure and betrayal delayed for another day. nt hay rick Jun 2024 #41

The SCOTUS version of delay. Raven123 Jun 2024 #42

But who could have standing? Johnny2X2X Jun 2024 #67

Well, that was a shocker! So unexpected, that now I'm suspicious. surfered Jun 2024 #43

Good, But... GB_RN Jun 2024 #48

Can it be mailed to Texas? LeftInTX Jun 2024 #49

MAGA is going to be BUTT hurt ... aggiesal Jun 2024 #50

Take that you little weasel SARose Jun 2024 #57

So they used a cowards way out to get to a proper ruling. bullimiami Jun 2024 #58

For now Hekate Jun 2024 #66

Color me pleasantly surprised. calimary Jun 2024 #69

I feel stupid. what does this decision mean for Lower courts? SleeplessinSoCal Jun 2024 #72

I didn't expect a unanimous decision Deep State Witch Jun 2024 #78

"The court stopped short of affirming Food and Drug Administration decisions to loosen restrictions on mifepristone..." J_William_Ryan Jun 2024 #79

My take Scalded Nun Jun 2024 #81

Anti choicers will have a stroke Demovictory9 Jun 2024 #82

The claim the doctors were making was...strange jmowreader Jun 2024 #83

The threat remains CousinIT Jun 2024 #85

A bridge too far even for this SCOTUS. Martin68 Jun 2024 #87

Statement from President Joe Biden on Supreme Court Decision on FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #88

I am astounded...in the BEST possible way! ShazzieB Jun 2024 #89

What the Supreme Court decision means for abortion pill access mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2024 #94