Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Father will be reunited with baby adopted without his knowledge, judge rules [View all]me b zola
(19,053 posts)81. Right, the numbers declined in the 1980's
Brozinsky (1994, p. 297) speaks of the decline in newborn adoptions as reflecting a freedom of choice embraced by youth and the womens movement of the 1960s-1970s, resulting in an increase in the number of unmarried mothers who kept their babies as opposed to surrendering them. In 1970, approximately 80% of the infants born to single mothers were placed for adoption, whereas by 1983 that figure had dropped to only 4%.
In contrast to numbers in the 1960s and 1970s, from 1989 to 1995 less than 1% of children born to never-married women were surrendered for adoption (Chandra, Abma, Maza, & Bachrach, 1999)
http://babyscoopera.com/home/what-was-the-baby-scoop-era/
Its a really interesting site if you're interested in woman's history. This is one of the areas that gets very little attention but was very significant in our history.
As you know then that there are several large groups that adoptees tend to fall into, and those of us relinquished at birth have a very different story from those who were removed from their home due to abuse. The adoption industry attempts to convince everyone that we all share a story like yours, but most adoptions are infant adoptions and have nothing to do with abuse or being unwanted.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Father will be reunited with baby adopted without his knowledge, judge rules [View all]
closeupready
Dec 2012
OP
the Utah grubs who illegally adopted the kid think they have a god given to right to keep her nt
msongs
Dec 2012
#1
No, in THIS case I started with and continue to support the father's position,
Lionessa
Dec 2012
#39
Interesting. Ordinarily the adoptive parents would be as responsible as birth parents.
Chemisse
Dec 2012
#48
A whole bunch of that applies to fathers as well. Why is it so hard to respect
jtuck004
Dec 2012
#18
Leaving people out is as disrespectuful as dissing them. Ask the people who chose all the white
jtuck004
Dec 2012
#28
You are right, when I wrote my comments it was before the articles making this point were posted
Tumbulu
Dec 2012
#97
Wait one second, are you SERIOUSLY suggesting that an INDIVIDUALS legal rights be determined
kelly1mm
Dec 2012
#35
It's sad for the child, but the adoptive parents should not have fought it for two years
Chemisse
Dec 2012
#50
Men's rights when it comes to family courts, is the last great civil rights battle. nt
aaaaaa5a
Dec 2012
#23
I've known many young women who adopted children out. That's true for NONE of them.
Xithras
Dec 2012
#89
I think it's great that we live in a country where people can make that kind of choice
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#54