Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Yellen says $3T of fresh capital is needed annually to fight climate change [View all]NNadir
(38,592 posts)...over the last nine years as expressed in the IEA graphic in my post will make any difference.
In my post I indicated that spending 50 trillion would have the same null result. That would be around around 3 trillion for 17 years.
It's very clear that "investments" in so called "renewable energy" do not work to address extreme global heating. In fact it's increasingly clear that they only entrench the use of fossil fuels and are, in fact, resulting in acceleration of the degradation of the atmosphere from the accumulation of the dangerous fossil fuel waste CO2.
To my mind, and perhaps the minds of others, this can be shown by the numbers for 2024 on new accumulations as measured at the Mauna Loa CO2 Observatory that I have been routinely following for a number of years, posting here about these numbers which are clear and unambiguous real, rational numbers. For example, the most recent among the long series I've composed, this from a few days ago:
Update on the Disastrous 2024 CO2 Data Recorded at Mauna Loa
Some text I modify as required for update for each in this series reflecting reality:
In this century, dominated by crowing about what so called "renewable energy" could, would, should, and even will do, the concentration of the dangerous fossil fuel waste carbon dioxide has risen by 56.10 ppm as of the data released this morning:
Weekly average CO2 at Mauna Loa
Week beginning on July 21, 2024: 424.80 ppm
Weekly value from 1 year ago: 421.28 ppm
Weekly value from 10 years ago: 398.97 ppm
Last updated: July 28, 2024
The result of throwing money around purportedly addressed at extreme global heating, now being observed worldwide, since 2015 is largely the same as if we had spent 4 trillion dollars building prayer cathedrals to ask some god or gods to end extreme global heating. That didn't work during the bubonic plague, and it won't work now, any more than updated worship of Aeolus and Apollo has worked. A reactionary return to dependence on the weather for energy supplies - abandoned in the 19th and 20th century for a reason - at precisely the time we have destabilized the weather should be recorded as way beyond foolish.
There is one, and only one, intelligent way to address extreme global heating, but at this point, after long unyielding vilification, it is 100% certain to fall under the rubric of "too little, too late." The planet is burning now.
Numbers don't lie. People lie, to themselves and each other, but numbers don't lie.
Have a pleasant Sunday evening.