Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: MAYHEM AHEAD: Ex-GOP Chair Says Chances Of Open Convention '50-50' [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)53. Really now? So this means Humphrey would have been forced through...
against RFK, had he not been assassinated? Or would the popular victory of RFK have forced Humphrey to use his delegates in a kingmaker fashion? Do you know what the intent was, prior to the assassination? Back then delegates were not required to vote their initial commitment, sounds like Humphrey had all of what we'd now call the "super delegates."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Like the douche bag knows or has any influence. Just being theatrical - it's reality tv.
geckosfeet
Jan 2012
#3
Why not? The GOP electorate has been fickle, hopping from candidate to candidate already.
Liberty Belle
Jan 2012
#30
I don't think it will happen either, but this will be the closest they've come in a long time. nt
onehandle
Jan 2012
#18
but every year they don't change from winner take all to proportional primaries
grantcart
Jan 2012
#42
Michael Steele??? WTF would he know about it? The man is as dense as a post.
yellowcanine
Jan 2012
#28
Because watching clowns hit each other with foam bats is fun and entertaining!!!!
Major Hogwash
Jan 2012
#38