Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: US judge tosses machine gun possession case, calls ban unconstitutional [View all]jmowreader
(53,226 posts)15. They also have benefits for people who live near gun ranges
If they couldnt completely remove them from Title III they could pretty easily amend it to put them in the same status as Any Other Weapons - five dollars transfer tax and the same background check as buying a typical firearm.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
US judge tosses machine gun possession case, calls ban unconstitutional [View all]
highplainsdem
Aug 2024
OP
The powers that be ie the GOP and the rich realized long ago that their agenda is not popular..
Botany
Aug 2024
#22
I've been predicting the overturning of automatic firearm regulation for years.
maxsolomon
Aug 2024
#4
That is what I thought--- although there are very high licensing fees to own one---
Jack Valentino
Aug 2024
#55
This is why America is a vast killing zone. 132 people die from a firearms-related injury each day.
C0RI0LANUS
Aug 2024
#6
see, historically, machine guns weren't banned between 1776 and 1934, so, cased closed
unblock
Aug 2024
#7
True. Either way, the jerks on the Supreme Court will probably lean on how they were not illegal
unblock
Aug 2024
#57
Id like to see the scalia 2nd a. Interpretation revisited. It was clueless as to its
Karadeniz
Aug 2024
#8
Yet the gun in this case was a modern weapon. A full-auto Glock handgun.
Spencer Martin
Aug 2024
#65
I've always wanted to have my own bazooka and howitzer. Sounds like that'd be OK, too.
TheRickles
Aug 2024
#19
A tank would definitely come in handy if you live in a stand-your-ground state.
TheRickles
Aug 2024
#23
Nope! A 20mm cannon for me or better, a 40mm autocannon. Can't ever have enough stopping power, eh?
machoneman
Aug 2024
#43
It's legal for you to own a machine gun as far as the federal government is concerned
Kaleva
Aug 2024
#33
I guess there's not enough judges that feel threatened by guns of war in their neighborhoods
mdbl
Aug 2024
#38
But I'll bet that we still can't bring a machine gun wiith us into Broomes' court.
Orrex
Aug 2024
#42
Despite what these crackpot judges say, the Second Amendment has NOTHING to do
valleyrogue
Aug 2024
#46
Thomas et al really should think through their opinions before they publish...
Josiesdad
Aug 2024
#52
Had a "friend" tell me : "Who cares who is President?" I think my reaction of "WTF" was appropriate.
Evolve Dammit
Aug 2024
#63