Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: US judge tosses machine gun possession case, calls ban unconstitutional [View all]Angleae
(4,803 posts)36. Actually, there's nothing stopping you from owning either.
Getting ammo is a bit difficult as it's an explosive device.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
US judge tosses machine gun possession case, calls ban unconstitutional [View all]
highplainsdem
Aug 2024
OP
The powers that be ie the GOP and the rich realized long ago that their agenda is not popular..
Botany
Aug 2024
#22
I've been predicting the overturning of automatic firearm regulation for years.
maxsolomon
Aug 2024
#4
That is what I thought--- although there are very high licensing fees to own one---
Jack Valentino
Aug 2024
#55
This is why America is a vast killing zone. 132 people die from a firearms-related injury each day.
C0RI0LANUS
Aug 2024
#6
see, historically, machine guns weren't banned between 1776 and 1934, so, cased closed
unblock
Aug 2024
#7
True. Either way, the jerks on the Supreme Court will probably lean on how they were not illegal
unblock
Aug 2024
#57
Id like to see the scalia 2nd a. Interpretation revisited. It was clueless as to its
Karadeniz
Aug 2024
#8
Yet the gun in this case was a modern weapon. A full-auto Glock handgun.
Spencer Martin
Aug 2024
#65
I've always wanted to have my own bazooka and howitzer. Sounds like that'd be OK, too.
TheRickles
Aug 2024
#19
A tank would definitely come in handy if you live in a stand-your-ground state.
TheRickles
Aug 2024
#23
Nope! A 20mm cannon for me or better, a 40mm autocannon. Can't ever have enough stopping power, eh?
machoneman
Aug 2024
#43
It's legal for you to own a machine gun as far as the federal government is concerned
Kaleva
Aug 2024
#33
I guess there's not enough judges that feel threatened by guns of war in their neighborhoods
mdbl
Aug 2024
#38
But I'll bet that we still can't bring a machine gun wiith us into Broomes' court.
Orrex
Aug 2024
#42
Despite what these crackpot judges say, the Second Amendment has NOTHING to do
valleyrogue
Aug 2024
#46
Thomas et al really should think through their opinions before they publish...
Josiesdad
Aug 2024
#52
Had a "friend" tell me : "Who cares who is President?" I think my reaction of "WTF" was appropriate.
Evolve Dammit
Aug 2024
#63