Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,307 posts)
14. That's a great piece. Thank you.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:09 PM
Dec 2012

I remember when a well-meaning nurse friend told me I shouldn't follow up on my son's asthma symptoms, because if he had that word on his record he'd have a preexisting condition.

So, asthma -- that's another one.

I couldn't imagine failing to get care for my wheezing son NOW because it might make him uninsurable in the future, but that's what the nurse would have done, if it were her kid.

Thank goodness for Obamacare. There's a floor under us now. Yeah, it would be nicer if there were a whole house called Medicare on top of it, but at least it's a floor. Better than the abyss we'd been staring into.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"unexpected"? lumberjack_jeff Dec 2012 #1
The fee was set forth in regulation, rather than in the law Yo_Mama Dec 2012 #22
Great, another excuse for companies to whine and outsource jobs. Flatulo Dec 2012 #2
Not getting anything back? Sedona Dec 2012 #3
Sooner or later, everyone everyone everyone will have a "pre-existing condition." WilliamPitt Dec 2012 #4
You are so right. Those who think they'll never have a preexisting condition are deluding themselves pnwmom Dec 2012 #6
This WilliamPitt Dec 2012 #11
That's a great piece. Thank you. pnwmom Dec 2012 #14
sometimes people who make ACA out to be the enemy of single payer forget how desperate some are CreekDog Dec 2012 #24
Big deal....... Sandy one Dec 2012 #26
And the 85/15 80/20 medical loss ratio is still in effect LiberalFighter Dec 2012 #5
$63 per minute? per day? per week? per paycheck? per month? per year? per lifetime? tarheelsunc Dec 2012 #7
Per year. It goes down every year for the 3 years it is in place, then it expires. cbayer Dec 2012 #10
$63 per year is a small price to pay to ensure everyone has access to health coverage. tarheelsunc Dec 2012 #16
Agree. They can afford it. cbayer Dec 2012 #17
$63 dollars per???? Thank you for answering exactly my question. SoapBox Dec 2012 #19
It's not being discovered just now. cbayer Dec 2012 #20
Right. Companies can afford it, and so can many individuals, elleng Dec 2012 #21
the welfare for insurance companies act will have many such outcomes nt msongs Dec 2012 #8
Did you think this through by any chance? RegieRocker Dec 2012 #9
The Savage Arithmetic of the Pre-Existing Condition WilliamPitt Dec 2012 #12
so that's why our premium went up 24% for 2013? maxsolomon Dec 2012 #13
How many billions do the health insurance companies take in that goes for overhead, profits, etc., RC Dec 2012 #15
What about the Credit we should get back lobodons Dec 2012 #18
$63, LOL Skittles Dec 2012 #23
$63/year? Seriously? high density Dec 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Surprise: New insurance f...»Reply #14