Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Wash. Has Enough Votes To Legalize Gay Marriage [View all]gratuitous
(82,849 posts)30. Except . . .
That the votes weren't there, then the governor made a forceful statement, and the votes were there. But I'm sure the two events are totally unrelated, and there's no way a parallel could be drawn (even if the two events were related somehow) on the national level.
It's just a mystery, I guess, how those Washington state senators all decided to change their minds or decided to give some oomph to a previously moribund bill.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
not sure when the vote is scheduled, but the house and senate are holding public hearings today.
maddezmom
Jan 2012
#4
Chances are it will, which is why supporters are glad that this is a Presidential election year.
pnwmom
Jan 2012
#27
Imagine the movement we would have and the example to our youth he would set by coming out vocally
FreeState
Jan 2012
#35
The vote were on the fence, and yes she did help. But she would have had less success
pnwmom
Jan 2012
#31
that is great. I am so looking forward to the time when this isn't even an issue.
uppityperson
Jan 2012
#15
Good eventually we'll have to have a supreme court case to decide this issue once and for all
craigmatic
Jan 2012
#46