Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Ruling could force Americans to decrypt laptops [View all]caseymoz
(5,763 posts)27. Except a key is much easier to forget.
Last edited Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:27 AM - Edit history (1)
It's not like it's a person you've spent time with and interviewed. People forget their passwords all the time, especially if they haven't used them in a while, including if they're in jail awaiting trial. And if you're like, over fifty . . .
Man, this is a bad ruling.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Even if only war spending ended, and first amendment issues were fixed, and pot were legalized,
crikkett
Jan 2012
#39
Due to the strength of the MIC I don't think Paul would be able to cut the military,
TBF
Jan 2012
#48
Excellent point - can't allow Social Security to be privatized under Paul or anyone.
crikkett
Jan 2012
#52
Last week I would have thought that the Court would hold with the "keys to the safe" theory.
Pab Sungenis
Jan 2012
#17
That's why I keep anything truly incriminating in the most secure location ever.
hobbit709
Jan 2012
#9
When making my annual Christmas trip to the mall, I saw some French cuff shirts
FarCenter
Jan 2012
#66
what part of 'not forced to incriminate oneself' does fucknut not understand?
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2012
#62