Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: "Excluding Indians": Trump admin questions Native Americans' birthright citizenship in court [View all]LeftInTX
(34,396 posts)23. Native Americans born on reservations were not
covered by the 14th Amendment. They are covered by an Act of Congress that was enacted in 1924.
Trump's EO does not impact Native Americans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Citizenship_Act
They're going over the history of the 14th Amendment and they began with 1866 Civil Rights Acts
all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and ...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1866
The 14th Amendment purposely excluded Native Americans because they were citizens of "Another Nation". Currently all Native Americans are US citizens. So, Trump's EO will not apply to them.
What the heritage guys are trying to prove is that birthright provided in the 14th Amendment does not apply to non-US citizens. They are rehashing a 1898 court case. Native Americans were not granted citizenship in that particular case, but infants of non-citizens born in the US were. It took an act of congress in 1924 to grant them citizenship. Hence, they are saying that citizenship is not allowed to infants born to non-citizens.
This is a pretty crafty legally maneuvering. However, it is not about making Native Americans non-citizens. It's about showing how the 14th Amendment should not a apply to the births of non-citizens because it didn't apply to Native Americans.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Excluding Indians": Trump admin questions Native Americans' birthright citizenship in court [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2025
OP
Not even three days in office and Trump has already created more chaos than he did his entire first term.
sop
Jan 2025
#29
Yes, it's absolutely ridiculous. Native Americans, the indigenous people here should sit in judgement...
brush
Jan 2025
#56
So their argument is "they changed the wording, so it must mean the same as the old wording"
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2025
#2
They're going back to the 1866 Civil Rights Act and the groundwork of the 14th Amendment, which excluded Native American
LeftInTX
Jan 2025
#49
I hope it makes sense. They're trying to argue that people born to non-citizens are non-citizens.
LeftInTX
Jan 2025
#52
The heritage foundation lawyer was trying to make an argument why he thinks non-citizens
LeftInTX
Jan 2025
#78
On June 2, 1924, Congress enacted the Indian Citizenship Act, which granted citizenship to all Native Americans born in
LetMyPeopleVote
Jan 2025
#95
Seems to me that if undocumented immigrants aren't subject to the jurisdiction of the United States...
AZSkiffyGeek
Jan 2025
#97
I would not stop them also-the white man took their land and have the nerve to treat them
Stargazer99
Jan 2025
#69
My mind is running through all the scenes of the most violent "Indian" attacks on racist white characters
hlthe2b
Jan 2025
#5
Still calling native peoples "Indians." And "who wants to pay 40,000 to bury a Mexican"? He is a domestic terrorist.
Evolve Dammit
Jan 2025
#24
I'm sick over all the people he is harming, and all the people he will harm as time goes by.
Solly Mack
Jan 2025
#39
Insane. What is his point. Native Americans are NATIVE. Here before any other race.
Fla Dem
Jan 2025
#32
Under Trump, Native Americans aren't Americans. No wonder he's an Andrew Jackson fan.
surfered
Jan 2025
#38
Pretty sure Native Americans already know they aren't "citizens" and never have been.
malthaussen
Jan 2025
#44
Native Americans have been citizens since 1924, under a law signed by Calvin Coolidge:
Liberty Belle
Jan 2025
#77
So, Trump is declaring that Native Americans are NOT US citizens?? Is this what he is saying?
riversedge
Jan 2025
#47
Yes! This was likely someone trying to justify that children born to non citizens were not granted citizenship by the
LeftInTX
Jan 2025
#67
Are all natural born children American citizens? No... there is one exception. Children of diplomats.
Norrrm
Jan 2025
#60
Maybe Rump is trying to get in Kristi Noem's pants. As far as I know, the puppy killer is still banned from seven out of
LaMouffette
Jan 2025
#61
When they're here in the US they are not subject to a foreign power unless they are working here for said foreign power.
cstanleytech
Jan 2025
#62
I know that, thanks. Just pointing out that the person calling them Indians is an ignoramus.
Sparky 1
Jan 2025
#85
He's citing old laws against Native Americans to justify Trump's EO against non-citizens.
LeftInTX
Jan 2025
#82
"The Salon article fails to mention that Native Americans were granted full citizenship in 1924
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2025
#87
The legal justification for TFG's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order is sad and wrong
LetMyPeopleVote
Jan 2025
#96