Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

primavera

(5,191 posts)
6. It's not a one or the other proposition
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:23 AM
Dec 2012

No one - repeat, NO ONE - here is saying that our mental health system does not also need reforming. What people are saying is that a population with so many members predisposed towards violence cannot afford to be allowed unfettered access to weapons of mass destruction. You don't give a toddler a hand grenade to play with as a toy. You don't give a drunk a Molotov cocktail. You don't give an arsonist a flamethrower. These are, one and all, very, very bad decisions. It doesn't matter that the grenade can be harmless in the hands of a skilled, trained professional. The point is, they are NOT safe in the hands of someone who is not an emotionally stable adult, trained in its proper usage. And therein lies the problem: the gun community insists that gun ownership is a right belonging to anyone and everyone, regardless of whether that person possesses the requisite mental stability and knowledge necessary to ensure their safe employment. Until ours is a society in which the underlying conditions that promote violence are under control, we are, in essence, infants who cannot be trusted to play with grenades. So, of course, we need to work on our mental health system, of course we need to work on poverty and income inequality, of course we need to work on racism and sexism and all forms of prejudice and discrimination. In the meantime, though, we have got to take the grenades away from the toddlers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is epidemic Flashmann Dec 2012 #1
+1 n/t crim son Dec 2012 #2
It is the media giving celebrity status to the gunman from the other day Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #10
People have a right to know marions ghost Dec 2012 #14
People don't need 24/7 coverage, though lbrtbell Dec 2012 #16
The news is always exploitative...but they seem to give people what they want. marions ghost Dec 2012 #23
HOLIDAY HYSTERIA OR END OF TIMES?? ROBROX Dec 2012 #15
Once again and still Reio88 Dec 2012 #3
Why? B Stieg Dec 2012 #5
It's not a one or the other proposition primavera Dec 2012 #6
"Violence and rage" have always been present in our society. thucythucy Dec 2012 #11
Rank and file Wermacht and Soviet soldiers who LanternWaste Dec 2012 #24
Ohforcryingoutloud!!!!! calimary Dec 2012 #4
Ah, another day... primavera Dec 2012 #7
"Shoot em' up cowboys".... glinda Dec 2012 #8
fucking heaven05 Dec 2012 #9
Yipee ki-yay m-fers! durablend Dec 2012 #12
It seems the NRA and the like are getting what they wanted.. and-justice-for-all Dec 2012 #13
Can't there be a "security screening" goclark Dec 2012 #17
I think I'd rather get shot than get groped to go see a movie. NM high density Dec 2012 #18
I hear your point goclark Dec 2012 #19
Is it actually a new epidemic -- or are we now just paying attention? mainer Dec 2012 #20
Wild West Shootout America! Tea Party good times...!! Bang Bang Conflict resolution for morons!...nt Evasporque Dec 2012 #21
Good thing the off-duty officer shot him before anyone else was hurt or killed n/t Bacchus4.0 Dec 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Shots Fired, Patrons Pani...»Reply #6