Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: (Thimerosal ban) Vaccine Rule Is Said to Hurt Health Efforts [View all]mzmolly
(52,766 posts)36. He and his research team, have conducted several studies on mercury
including at least one major study on ethyl mercury.
Again, please watch the video, time permitting.
Here is a synopsis of his research on ethyl-mercury, given you're at work.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1280369/
snip ...
Brain concentrations of total mercury were approximately 34 times lower in the thimerosal group than in the methylmercury group, and total mercury cleared more rapidly in the thimerosal group (with a half-life of 24.2 days versus 59.5 days). However, the proportion of inorganic mercury in the brain was much higher in the thimerosal group (2186% of total mercury) compared to the methylmercury group (610%). Brain concentrations of inorganic mercury were approximately twice as high in the thimerosal group compared to the methylmercury group. Inorganic mercury remains in the brain much longer than organic mercury, with an estimated half-life of more than a year. Its not currently known whether inorganic mercury presents any risk to the developing brain.
Given these findings, the researchers caution that risk assessments for thimerosal based on studies using blood mercury measurements may not be valid, depending on the design of the study. Further, the observed differences in distribution and breakdown of mercury compounds between exposed groups indicate that methylmercury is not a suitable model for thimerosal toxicity.
The researchers emphasize, however, that the risks associated with low-level exposures to inorganic mercury in the developing brain are unknown, and they describe other research linking persistent inorganic mercury exposure with increased activation of microglia in the brain, an effect recently reported in children with autism. They recommend further research focused specifically on the biotransformation of thimerosal and its neurotoxic potential.
Given these findings, the researchers caution that risk assessments for thimerosal based on studies using blood mercury measurements may not be valid, depending on the design of the study. Further, the observed differences in distribution and breakdown of mercury compounds between exposed groups indicate that methylmercury is not a suitable model for thimerosal toxicity.
The researchers emphasize, however, that the risks associated with low-level exposures to inorganic mercury in the developing brain are unknown, and they describe other research linking persistent inorganic mercury exposure with increased activation of microglia in the brain, an effect recently reported in children with autism. They recommend further research focused specifically on the biotransformation of thimerosal and its neurotoxic potential.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OR we can use vaccines with a known working preservative, and change over if we have a
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2012
#69
Post #57 links to essential reading summarizing the relevant scientific literature.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2012
#70
There is an anti vaccine contingent. Your snarky response not withstanding.
yellowcanine
Dec 2012
#33
Maybe but if you read those sites they really are anti-vaccine, for whatever reason.
yellowcanine
Dec 2012
#38
"potentially vulnerable children should be considered and insulated from the risks"
yellowcanine
Dec 2012
#45
The video I posted is from a presentation in 2008. Four years, renders the research obsolete?
mzmolly
Dec 2012
#40
Burbacher is a respected scientist and mercury expert, who helped make the case
mzmolly
Dec 2012
#29
Silly as this is getting - I don't believe the claims by big peanut and their surrogates.
mzmolly
Dec 2012
#52
I understand from a public policy stand-point, that we should find cost effective solutions to mass
mzmolly
Dec 2012
#61
Nope, think again starting with any blind defense of Dr. Thorsen's work.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2012
#59