Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(170,791 posts)

2. Good

Mon Feb 24, 2025, 11:55 AM

Feb 2025

There's a difference between "first amendment rights to protest" and actually being allowed to assault (and even kill) people as part of a protest.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Good news, for a change. Timeflyer Feb 2025 #1

Good BumRushDaShow Feb 2025 #2

And buffer zone for other things like nuclear power plants exboyfil Feb 2025 #3

I'm stunned. 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2025 #4

I hope a lawsuit challenges this Owens Feb 2025 #8

but wouldn't the kremlin et tu Feb 2025 #10

Most first thought was about their personnel homes tinymontgomery Feb 2025 #12

Maybe because the buffer around SCOTUS itself would be illegal? cstanleytech Feb 2025 #6

But protestors can't protest near their homes Owens Feb 2025 #7

They, themselves, may be afraid of protestors slightlv Feb 2025 #9

SCOTUS had a lot at stake Deminpenn Feb 2025 #13