Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: (Thimerosal ban) Vaccine Rule Is Said to Hurt Health Efforts [View all]mzmolly
(52,801 posts)52. Silly as this is getting - I don't believe the claims by big peanut and their surrogates.
Primarily, that there are no viable alternatives. Or, that it's a waste of resources to spare children a life threatening reaction, in order to save their lives.
I don't feel that the makers of Plumpynut should have a corner on the nutrition market, AND have the ability to essentially say die or eat our product - children of the world.
Lastly, a word from our sponsor.
One must never, ever critique Plumpynut, lest they be deemed supportive of killing babies via starvation. Plumpynut saves more lives than it claims and we are not to discuss improving the safety of Plumpynut, ever - as it can't be improved. There is no evidence that peanuts cause allergic reaction in the amounts used in Plumpynut products. Further, if a child is harmed by Plumpynut it's likely coincidental. If not, it was an unavoidable tragedy so stop talking about solutions! We can't solve the problem, because there isn't one.
I don't feel that the makers of Plumpynut should have a corner on the nutrition market, AND have the ability to essentially say die or eat our product - children of the world.
Lastly, a word from our sponsor.
One must never, ever critique Plumpynut, lest they be deemed supportive of killing babies via starvation. Plumpynut saves more lives than it claims and we are not to discuss improving the safety of Plumpynut, ever - as it can't be improved. There is no evidence that peanuts cause allergic reaction in the amounts used in Plumpynut products. Further, if a child is harmed by Plumpynut it's likely coincidental. If not, it was an unavoidable tragedy so stop talking about solutions! We can't solve the problem, because there isn't one.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OR we can use vaccines with a known working preservative, and change over if we have a
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2012
#69
Post #57 links to essential reading summarizing the relevant scientific literature.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2012
#70
There is an anti vaccine contingent. Your snarky response not withstanding.
yellowcanine
Dec 2012
#33
Maybe but if you read those sites they really are anti-vaccine, for whatever reason.
yellowcanine
Dec 2012
#38
"potentially vulnerable children should be considered and insulated from the risks"
yellowcanine
Dec 2012
#45
The video I posted is from a presentation in 2008. Four years, renders the research obsolete?
mzmolly
Dec 2012
#40
Burbacher is a respected scientist and mercury expert, who helped make the case
mzmolly
Dec 2012
#29
Silly as this is getting - I don't believe the claims by big peanut and their surrogates.
mzmolly
Dec 2012
#52
I understand from a public policy stand-point, that we should find cost effective solutions to mass
mzmolly
Dec 2012
#61
Nope, think again starting with any blind defense of Dr. Thorsen's work.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2012
#59