Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Excellent Johnny2X2X Mar 2025 #1
ThIS. Is exactly how businesses operate dreamland Mar 2025 #14
Didn't shithole just thanked the chief at the fucked up speech....... Lovie777 Mar 2025 #2
There is still a spark of life in the House having control of the purse. gab13by13 Mar 2025 #3
Yes, although it's concerning that it was 5-4 and not 9-0. NYC Liberal Mar 2025 #4
Yes. At the very least it should have been 7/2 (HE really owns two of them, NOW 4 of them) bluestarone Mar 2025 #9
tomas and Alito don't even pretend. Jakes Progress Mar 2025 #25
Yea, how i wish we had enough congress members to finally rid ourselves of at least bluestarone Mar 2025 #26
The regime can ignore court orders. Voltaire2 Mar 2025 #7
Good because if not BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #5
I wish the writer had made that headline a little clearer dweller Mar 2025 #6
Same for me. Polly Hennessey Mar 2025 #13
I thought same! Hope22 Mar 2025 #19
It gets complicated like... forgotmylogin Mar 2025 #29
Let's not celebrate quite yet. groundloop Mar 2025 #8
The order reads like it is going back to the lower court to revise it's order because it's GoodRaisin Mar 2025 #23
I guess fulfilling a contractual obligation isn't the complex legal question some suggested Prairie Gates Mar 2025 #10
"The high court split 5-4 in denying the request from the Trump administration, with Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barre riversedge Mar 2025 #11
Roberts switched his vote Deminpenn Mar 2025 #16
You are mistaken. The full court did not issue the original administrative stay. onenote Mar 2025 #18
This could be interesting. What will he do, knowing how close this vote was? bluestarone Mar 2025 #12
SCOTUS has *upheld* a lower court's order forcing USAID/State to immediately pay $2 billion owed to contractors LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #15
This is a wildly dangerous sign -- only five SCOTUS votes for paying congressionally mandated invoices. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2025 #17
It's the same group of assholes that gave Dump immunity from prosecution mdbl Mar 2025 #21
The court can seize bank accounts and property. Trump tower, Berkshire and marry lardo! PortTack Mar 2025 #20
The Associated Press isn't pulling any punches. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2025 #22
Alito says he's 'stunned' the Supreme Court ruled against Trump over USAID's funding Eugene Mar 2025 #24
They won't openly deny the Supreme Court Bluetus Mar 2025 #27
trump administration has until 11 a.m. tomrorow to tell judge how it's going to comply with order LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #28
The fact this was a 5-4 decision shows just to what degree our Democracy is in peril. SKKY Mar 2025 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court won't lift ...»Reply #4