Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(45,991 posts)
18. You are mistaken. The full court did not issue the original administrative stay.
Wed Mar 5, 2025, 11:01 AM
Mar 2025

Last edited Wed Mar 5, 2025, 12:11 PM - Edit history (1)

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to vacate the district court order unfreezing the funds. They also sought an administrative stay while that request was considered by the Court. The request for an order vacating the district court decision and for an administrative stay pending a decision was made to CJ Roberts who granted the administrative stay and referred the underlying "vacatur" request to the full Court. This was and is standard operating procedure. Requests for emergency relief can be submitted to and acted on by a single justice. Because the district court decision at issue came from the US District Court for the District of Columbia, the emergency relief request had to be submitted to him -- as the justice assigned to the DC federal courts -- in the first instance. His decision to grant the administrative stay was unsurprising, since if he had denied it, the Trump administration could then have immediately renewed their request before any of the other justices. The only time the full court considered the administration's emergency relief request was after the administrative stay was granted and the underlying request for vacatur had been fully briefed.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Excellent Johnny2X2X Mar 2025 #1
ThIS. Is exactly how businesses operate dreamland Mar 2025 #14
Didn't shithole just thanked the chief at the fucked up speech....... Lovie777 Mar 2025 #2
There is still a spark of life in the House having control of the purse. gab13by13 Mar 2025 #3
Yes, although it's concerning that it was 5-4 and not 9-0. NYC Liberal Mar 2025 #4
Yes. At the very least it should have been 7/2 (HE really owns two of them, NOW 4 of them) bluestarone Mar 2025 #9
tomas and Alito don't even pretend. Jakes Progress Mar 2025 #25
Yea, how i wish we had enough congress members to finally rid ourselves of at least bluestarone Mar 2025 #26
The regime can ignore court orders. Voltaire2 Mar 2025 #7
Good because if not BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #5
I wish the writer had made that headline a little clearer dweller Mar 2025 #6
Same for me. Polly Hennessey Mar 2025 #13
I thought same! Hope22 Mar 2025 #19
It gets complicated like... forgotmylogin Mar 2025 #29
Let's not celebrate quite yet. groundloop Mar 2025 #8
The order reads like it is going back to the lower court to revise it's order because it's GoodRaisin Mar 2025 #23
I guess fulfilling a contractual obligation isn't the complex legal question some suggested Prairie Gates Mar 2025 #10
"The high court split 5-4 in denying the request from the Trump administration, with Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barre riversedge Mar 2025 #11
Roberts switched his vote Deminpenn Mar 2025 #16
You are mistaken. The full court did not issue the original administrative stay. onenote Mar 2025 #18
This could be interesting. What will he do, knowing how close this vote was? bluestarone Mar 2025 #12
SCOTUS has *upheld* a lower court's order forcing USAID/State to immediately pay $2 billion owed to contractors LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #15
This is a wildly dangerous sign -- only five SCOTUS votes for paying congressionally mandated invoices. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2025 #17
It's the same group of assholes that gave Dump immunity from prosecution mdbl Mar 2025 #21
The court can seize bank accounts and property. Trump tower, Berkshire and marry lardo! PortTack Mar 2025 #20
The Associated Press isn't pulling any punches. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2025 #22
Alito says he's 'stunned' the Supreme Court ruled against Trump over USAID's funding Eugene Mar 2025 #24
They won't openly deny the Supreme Court Bluetus Mar 2025 #27
trump administration has until 11 a.m. tomrorow to tell judge how it's going to comply with order LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #28
The fact this was a 5-4 decision shows just to what degree our Democracy is in peril. SKKY Mar 2025 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court won't lift ...»Reply #18