Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court won't lift lower court order unfreezing foreign aid funds [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(68,311 posts)22. The Associated Press isn't pulling any punches.
Divided Supreme Court rejects Trump administrations push to rebuke judge over foreign aid freeze
The Associated Press
March 5, 2025, 10:11 AM
WASHINGTON (AP) A sharply divided Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a Trump administration push to rebuke a federal judge who imposed a quick deadline to release billions of dollars in foreign aid.
By a 5-4 vote, the court told U.S. District Judge Amir Ali to clarify his earlier order that required the Republican administration to release nearly $2 billion in aid for work that had already been done.
Although the outcome is a short-term loss for President Donald Trumps administration, the nonprofit groups and businesses that sued are still waiting for the money they say they are owed. One of the organizations last week was forced to lay off 110 employees as a result, according to court papers.
Its the second time the new administration has sought and failed to persuade the Supreme Court to immediately rein in a lower-court judge in legal fights over actions taken by Trump.
{snip}
___
Follow the APs coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
Copyright © 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
The Associated Press
March 5, 2025, 10:11 AM
WASHINGTON (AP) A sharply divided Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a Trump administration push to rebuke a federal judge who imposed a quick deadline to release billions of dollars in foreign aid.
By a 5-4 vote, the court told U.S. District Judge Amir Ali to clarify his earlier order that required the Republican administration to release nearly $2 billion in aid for work that had already been done.
Although the outcome is a short-term loss for President Donald Trumps administration, the nonprofit groups and businesses that sued are still waiting for the money they say they are owed. One of the organizations last week was forced to lay off 110 employees as a result, according to court papers.
Its the second time the new administration has sought and failed to persuade the Supreme Court to immediately rein in a lower-court judge in legal fights over actions taken by Trump.
{snip}
___
Follow the APs coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
Copyright © 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court won't lift lower court order unfreezing foreign aid funds [View all]
NYC Liberal
Mar 2025
OP
Yes. At the very least it should have been 7/2 (HE really owns two of them, NOW 4 of them)
bluestarone
Mar 2025
#9
Yea, how i wish we had enough congress members to finally rid ourselves of at least
bluestarone
Mar 2025
#26
The order reads like it is going back to the lower court to revise it's order because it's
GoodRaisin
Mar 2025
#23
I guess fulfilling a contractual obligation isn't the complex legal question some suggested
Prairie Gates
Mar 2025
#10
"The high court split 5-4 in denying the request from the Trump administration, with Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barre
riversedge
Mar 2025
#11
You are mistaken. The full court did not issue the original administrative stay.
onenote
Mar 2025
#18
This could be interesting. What will he do, knowing how close this vote was?
bluestarone
Mar 2025
#12
SCOTUS has *upheld* a lower court's order forcing USAID/State to immediately pay $2 billion owed to contractors
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2025
#15
This is a wildly dangerous sign -- only five SCOTUS votes for paying congressionally mandated invoices.
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2025
#17
The court can seize bank accounts and property. Trump tower, Berkshire and marry lardo!
PortTack
Mar 2025
#20
Alito says he's 'stunned' the Supreme Court ruled against Trump over USAID's funding
Eugene
Mar 2025
#24
trump administration has until 11 a.m. tomrorow to tell judge how it's going to comply with order
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2025
#28