Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AlexSatan

(535 posts)
50. I'm not really familiar with the training courses
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 08:04 PM
Dec 2012

I would think for those carrying in a school, an initial ~4hr class that includes shooting fundamentals and gun familiarization (assembly/disassembly/cleaning) with a shooting session.

Followed by another 2 hours of scenario-driven shooting exercise mixing simulated fire and real fire on the range. And repeat that every 6 months.

I'm a big 2A advocate but I think things need to be tightened up. I just got my CCP in CO and I didn't require any training since I had left the military within 3 years. That actually concerned me. If I hadn't gone through 9mm/M4 (GUA-5) training a year or so prior for deployment training, it would have been over 20 years since I had any training. In that time, I had fired my shotgun twice. That was it.

And I don't need training for 5 years. I am very cautious and respectful of guns so I will make sure I am completely comfortable and competent with a handgun before I will carry in public.

I was also surprised when I went in last Friday morning to buy a handgun (I'd been planning it for a while and it had nothing to do with the shooting) and was surprised to find out that I could have walked out a half hour later if they didn't need to special order what I wanted. I thought there was more of a waiting period.

Frankly, I would be more comfortable with training being required, even for military, unless they have had actual training within the past two years. And I support a week waiting period to buy a gun.

I could even live with a license being required to open carry as long as it is not cost-prohibitive.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We should not be surprised, this is Oklahoma redstatebluegirl Dec 2012 #1
Saw my first "open carry" yesphan Dec 2012 #8
I saw one in a restaurant and left redstatebluegirl Dec 2012 #32
This is so that the shooters will know who to kill first. nt Speck Tater Dec 2012 #2
I never thought of that. nt Walk away Dec 2012 #26
That is one of the downsides to open carry. ManiacJoe Dec 2012 #30
Hmmm..... Turbineguy Dec 2012 #3
Colorado has always been open carry. Drahthaardogs Dec 2012 #31
It's not whether or not you are allowed to by law Turbineguy Dec 2012 #34
Of course it didn't. AlexSatan Dec 2012 #40
Do you support or oppose that law? neverforget Dec 2012 #41
I think properly trained AlexSatan Dec 2012 #46
Should they carry in the open so the kids should see it? Or should they keep it locked neverforget Dec 2012 #47
I don't believe there is any advantage to open carry AlexSatan Dec 2012 #48
What kind of training would you give them? neverforget Dec 2012 #49
I'm not really familiar with the training courses AlexSatan Dec 2012 #50
Thank you for responding. neverforget Dec 2012 #51
However, the problem we are combating AlexSatan Dec 2012 #52
repigs' "thought" processes bongbong Dec 2012 #4
How soon and how many kids will be shot with a teacher's gun? jpak Dec 2012 #5
Yup, this is just another setup for the fall. Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #9
My daughter had a very bad experience HockeyMom Dec 2012 #29
Have they considered the possibility of a kid stealing a gun from a teacher and using it? yellowcanine Dec 2012 #6
They are incapable of such analysis jimlup Dec 2012 #7
training probably wouldn't help... mike dub Dec 2012 #10
I agree. Even well trained active police officers would be challenged in that situation. yellowcanine Dec 2012 #11
comment from a news story... backtoblue Dec 2012 #25
I feel for you... Toronto Dec 2012 #54
Of course not. And this is WAY more likely than... YvonneCa Dec 2012 #38
Most teachers... AnneD Dec 2012 #12
Oklahomastan. Where nervous women and children are loving to survive. ancianita Dec 2012 #13
So more little kids can die. Great. AllyCat Dec 2012 #14
I live in Oklahoma Joey Liberal Dec 2012 #15
Oklahoma -- You mean that the teachers there are not already "packing"? eringer Dec 2012 #16
Rick Perry sent most of the teachers in Texas packing BrightKnight Dec 2012 #24
Oh for fuck's sake... Odin2005 Dec 2012 #17
These bigoted, funddie folks are already unbalanced. kelliekat44 Dec 2012 #18
sick. SoapBox Dec 2012 #19
The last thing schools need obama2terms Dec 2012 #20
Florida has a bill proposing this also HockeyMom Dec 2012 #21
I can't see many first grade teachers choosing to carry a gun in the classroom. - n/t BrightKnight Dec 2012 #22
Will they get "combat pay" as an extra for being armed? dmosh42 Dec 2012 #23
Instead of dumping the gun responsibility on their warhorse teachers, they could take a look at ancianita Dec 2012 #27
What I like about this idea is that we really don't need... Walk away Dec 2012 #28
Certify them as EMTs yesphan Dec 2012 #33
And give them a white belt and a stop sign on a stick and post them at crosswalks too! Walk away Dec 2012 #39
I've posted this before, but... Bigmack Dec 2012 #35
saw this on Facebook today SemperEadem Dec 2012 #36
Except that it is not true AlexSatan Dec 2012 #44
and you make the point well SemperEadem Dec 2012 #55
You could argue that point either way AlexSatan Dec 2012 #56
Saw that coming... Coyote_Tan Dec 2012 #37
Absolutely ridiculous. Owl Dec 2012 #42
but what if the teachers are them Sharia type teachers? underpants Dec 2012 #43
Gun holsters: Prada, Gucci, D&G .. a new fashion trend! YOHABLO Dec 2012 #45
lol... sociopaths widening the NEED for more guns fascisthunter Dec 2012 #53
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Oklahoma Will Consider La...»Reply #50