Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(173,663 posts)

2. In this case

Reply to Irish_Dem (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 19, 2025, 08:17 PM

Mar 2025

it may be a good sign. I would hope they would never entertainment wholesale throwing out a Constitutional Amendment.

Of course they could say - "Go pound sand". But then maybe they want to write something up to preclude this issue coming up again later.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

TomSlick ancianita

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court seems in no hurry to rule on Trump plea to rein in judges over birthright citizenship [View all] BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 OP

Judges always drag their feet when it comes to America's biggest criminal. Irish_Dem Mar 2025 #1

In this case BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #2

When dealing with a vicious psychopath dragging feet is never a good thing. Irish_Dem Mar 2025 #4

(Smackdown) Guardrails are definitely needed BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #5

SCOTUS is not "dragging their feet." They are letting court decisions against Trump stand. That's good right? Martin68 Mar 2025 #9

You are correct. TomSlick Mar 2025 #6

Perhaps you misunderstand the post. It says the Supreme court is not striking down decisions by judges to block Trump Martin68 Mar 2025 #7

Not Optimistic yankee87 Mar 2025 #3

The article says SCOTUS is not striking down decisions by judges against Trump. That supports democracy, not fasicsm. Martin68 Mar 2025 #8

Future decisions yankee87 Mar 2025 #10

Wrong headline choie Mar 2025 #11

Uh, the effect of the Court's schedule is to "reign in" -- or rather rein in -- Trump on birthright citizenship onenote Mar 2025 #13

Kagan, Jackson and Roberts are the ones that slow rolled the Court's consideration of Trump's appeals onenote Mar 2025 #12