Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

onenote

(46,344 posts)

12. Kagan, Jackson and Roberts are the ones that slow rolled the Court's consideration of Trump's appeals

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Thu Mar 20, 2025, 11:32 AM

Mar 2025

Trump simultaneously filed separate emergency requests for stay of three district court decisions striking down his birthright citizenship order. One was filed with CJ Roberts, who handles emergency stay requests of District of Maryland cases, one with Justice Jackson, who handles emergency stay requests of District of Massachusetts cases,, and one with Justice Kagan, who handles District of Washington cases. Each Justice decided -- probably in consultation with each other -- to set an April 4 deadline for those opposing Trump's request to respond. In the meantime, the decisions blocking his order remain in effect.

Why does this seem to bother some DUers?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Moosepoop

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court seems in no hurry to rule on Trump plea to rein in judges over birthright citizenship [View all] BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 OP

Judges always drag their feet when it comes to America's biggest criminal. Irish_Dem Mar 2025 #1

In this case BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #2

When dealing with a vicious psychopath dragging feet is never a good thing. Irish_Dem Mar 2025 #4

(Smackdown) Guardrails are definitely needed BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #5

SCOTUS is not "dragging their feet." They are letting court decisions against Trump stand. That's good right? Martin68 Mar 2025 #9

You are correct. TomSlick Mar 2025 #6

Perhaps you misunderstand the post. It says the Supreme court is not striking down decisions by judges to block Trump Martin68 Mar 2025 #7

Not Optimistic yankee87 Mar 2025 #3

The article says SCOTUS is not striking down decisions by judges against Trump. That supports democracy, not fasicsm. Martin68 Mar 2025 #8

Future decisions yankee87 Mar 2025 #10

Wrong headline choie Mar 2025 #11

Uh, the effect of the Court's schedule is to "reign in" -- or rather rein in -- Trump on birthright citizenship onenote Mar 2025 #13

Kagan, Jackson and Roberts are the ones that slow rolled the Court's consideration of Trump's appeals onenote Mar 2025 #12