Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

moniss

(9,201 posts)

1. This is not a good sign. It may

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri Apr 18, 2025, 09:55 PM

Apr 2025

well signal to Crumb The 1st and the fascists that defiance of court orders and any subsequent contempt proceedings will be slow walked into obscurity. During which time Crumb The 1st can "replace" the individual cited for contempt and then the DOJ will move to dismiss based on being mooted. His own contempt would of course go in front of the SC that has already granted him immunity.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

dweller Bluethroughu

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Appeals court halts Boasberg's contempt proceedings against Trump administration [View all] BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 OP

This is not a good sign. It may moniss Apr 2025 #1

This is a unique situation - not easily transferrable to other situations. Ms. Toad Apr 2025 #2

In normal times it would not be "easily transferrable" moniss Apr 2025 #3

I didn't say they won't attempt to use it. Ms. Toad Apr 2025 #4

The underlying case being ultimately found to be in the wrong jurisdiction moniss Apr 2025 #5