Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(172,716 posts)
Tue Apr 29, 2025, 08:04 PM Apr 2025

Supreme Court decides Medicare reimbursement calculation [View all]

Source: Roll Call

Posted April 29, 2025 at 11:38am


The Supreme Court sided on Tuesday with the Department of Health and Human Services in a dispute over the rate under Medicare the government pays to hospitals that serve low-income patients. The 7-2 decision rejected an attempt from a group of more than 200 hospitals across 30 states to change the formula the government uses to calculate reimbursement for hospitals that serve a disproportionate share of low-income patients.

The justices decided that the calculation hinges on how many patients received Social Security Supplemental Security Income program benefits in a given month, rather than the larger group that are enrolled in the program generally.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority of the court, said that the phrase in the law specifying that the formula be based on patients “entitled” to the SSI benefit meant the portion of patients who actually received a check in the month they were hospitalized. “We must respect the formula that Congress prescribed,” Barrett wrote.

The hospital groups had asked the justices to overturn a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit which issued a similar holding restricting the reimbursement calculation to those patients who received the SSI benefit.

Read more: https://rollcall.com/2025/04/29/supreme-court-decides-medicare-reimbursement-calculation/



The M$M completely ignored this story.
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I've seen this story numerous places including all the leading healthcare information sites. Silent Type Apr 2025 #1
"I've seen this story numerous places including all the leading healthcare information sites." BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #2
Doubt any CBS, NBC, etc., viewers really care about a reimbursement formula that has existed for decades. Silent Type Apr 2025 #3
Given that we're talking about "Medicare" BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #4
They upheld Medicare's longstanding rule. That has nothing to do with chopping Medicare Silent Type Apr 2025 #5
Oh I know this case goes back some BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #29
Yeah, most docs are nothing like you describe. elias7 Apr 2025 #16
Absolutely not true. In 1980s Orthopedists made well over $10,000 for 2 hip replacement. Thst's way over Silent Type Apr 2025 #19
I work in a healthcare related industry Earl_from_PA Apr 2025 #6
Thank you for that explanation FemDemERA Apr 2025 #7
Medicare fraud Earl_from_PA Apr 2025 #8
It's both. That's coming from the Centers for Medicaid Services. Wiz Imp Apr 2025 #13
You are correct Earl_from_PA Apr 2025 #15
Yet, every year more DME companies start up and make good money. While there are codes with poor reimbursement, there Silent Type Apr 2025 #9
Please provide Earl_from_PA Apr 2025 #10
Do you make a decent living? If you don't own the DME company, does the owner make a decent living? Silent Type Apr 2025 #11
So no specific example Earl_from_PA Apr 2025 #12
Don't have my DME Fee Schedule in front of me. But I've never met anyone in DME who wasn't making a decent amount, Silent Type Apr 2025 #14
"but tons of providers do well with a substantial Medicare patient base." Earl_from_PA Apr 2025 #18
I bet you'd go broke in a few months if you cut out Medicare, unless you've already limited it. Silent Type Apr 2025 #21
Do you work for free? Earl_from_PA Apr 2025 #23
Work free quite often, but not always. And you don't either, you just want more apparently. Silent Type Apr 2025 #24
I want Earl_from_PA Apr 2025 #25
Heard it before. Any Democrat who calls for a big reimbursement increase in this environment should be primaried Silent Type Apr 2025 #26
The whole point of the OP Earl_from_PA Apr 2025 #20
So, how much do you think we should increase their reimbursement? And who is going to propose this big increase Silent Type Apr 2025 #22
No wonder Canada rejected MAGA orangecrush Apr 2025 #17
re: "patients entitled' to the SSI benefit meant the portion of patients who actually received a check in the month" thesquanderer Apr 2025 #27
How dare the SC rule in favor of the Biden Admin. The case was filed against HHS/CMS/MEDICARE head Silent Type Apr 2025 #28
You haven't addressed the questions posed to you in this OP BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court decides Med...