Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UpInArms

(53,864 posts)
8. From the link
Fri Aug 15, 2025, 06:10 AM
Aug 2025
"They now claim that 'if the President does not have the authority to designate acting Board members, then the President must have the authority to remove [Ms.] Aviel himself' pursuant to his inherent Article II powers," AliKhan summarized. "In other words, President Trump's inability to appoint Mr. Marocco enables him to skip past the IAF's principal officers to terminate its inferior officer."

That "has worrisome implications" if true, the judge continued, because it would mean Trump has created or discovered a "basic loophole" to "easily circumvent the general restriction on firing inferior officers by simply firing the principal officers."

"That makes no sense," AliKhan remarked, since Trump would be able to "fire an otherwise-unfireable officer by first terminating her superiors."

In parting shots, the judge called the administration's arguments "riddled with constitutional contradictions" and took a dim view of the upshot of the administration's "novel and wrong" assertion that Trump has "'inherent' Article II power to appoint acting officials" like Marocco, regardless of congressional intent.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Republicons obviously hate Christ and his teachings BoRaGard Aug 2025 #1
They hate most of those teachings IbogaProject Aug 2025 #17
The only reason these illegal firings have had the effects they have is because... Hugin Aug 2025 #2
Yes, this needs to change NJCher Aug 2025 #5
Some do, but most reporters just do straight reporting and don't want to make that sort of LymphocyteLover Aug 2025 #13
Yes NJCher Aug 2025 #15
Also Congressional REPUBLICANS DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT THEIR GUY BREAKING THE LAW LymphocyteLover Aug 2025 #12
THIS is how he's so powerful. bluestarone Aug 2025 #16
Neither do Quanto Magnus Aug 2025 #21
Awesome MaineBlueBear Aug 2025 #3
Always gotta' get that NJCher Aug 2025 #6
Yes, lest we forget MaineBlueBear Aug 2025 #18
if that's the case NJCher Aug 2025 #19
Sounds serious Torchlight Aug 2025 #20
How are there four paragraphs here and we have no idea what the loophole in the headline is? Prairie Gates Aug 2025 #4
From the link UpInArms Aug 2025 #8
Clicking the link went right to the info wolfie001 Aug 2025 #9
Posting just the loophole paragraph would have been fine Prairie Gates Aug 2025 #10
Yes! That was the main point! wolfie001 Aug 2025 #11
There is no "loophole". The judge stated that it was basically nonexistent but suddenly "created" in the idiotic E.O. BumRushDaShow Aug 2025 #14
With 6 christo-fascist pigs sitting on the SC...... wolfie001 Aug 2025 #7
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge startled by...»Reply #8