Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: A depraved world: FBI agents wage a stressful battle against child pornography [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)55. A strong rebuttal could be written. Providing sources requires effort & time, I decided against it.
Comment directed to lunatica by booley:
"Anyway, I am sure the point where (you) show that what the guy says is factually wrong will be coming up any minute now. You know, the part where (you) show mindpilot is wrong and don't just engage in an ad hominem attack."
However, here's a simple start.
POST 28. ...Just an example how deep this stupidity goes, it is now a law in California that any IT worker can be held criminally liable for child porn on any system they touch even if they did not know it was there.
http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/telecom/child-pornography-reporting-requirements.aspx
Child Pornography Reporting Requirements for Computer Technicians and Information Technology Workers
As of October 19, 2012
At least nine states--Arkansas, California, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, and South Dakota--have enacted laws requiring computer technicians or information technology workers to report child pornography if they encounter it in the scope of their work. The laws don't require technicians or service providers to search for the illegal material, only to report it if they find it. Similar laws apply to film developers who encounter child pornography on the job. Michigan law provides confidentiality and immunity from civil liability for computer technicians who report child pornography encountered in the scope of their work. (See statutory excerpts below.)
Critics charge that this type of law unfairly transfers law enforcement duties to individuals who may not be qualified to handle evidence or determine what constitutes child pornography. Supporters say reporting mandates for photo labs have proven effective, and that similar laws for IT workers will help combat child pornography on the Internet.
PLEASE NOTE: The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) serves state legislators and their staff. This site provides comparative information only and should not be construed as legal advice. NCSL cannot provide assistance with individual cases.
State Statutes (Excerpts) at link.
Child Pornography Reporting Requirements for Computer Technicians and Information Technology Workers
As of October 19, 2012
At least nine states--Arkansas, California, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, and South Dakota--have enacted laws requiring computer technicians or information technology workers to report child pornography if they encounter it in the scope of their work. The laws don't require technicians or service providers to search for the illegal material, only to report it if they find it. Similar laws apply to film developers who encounter child pornography on the job. Michigan law provides confidentiality and immunity from civil liability for computer technicians who report child pornography encountered in the scope of their work. (See statutory excerpts below.)
Critics charge that this type of law unfairly transfers law enforcement duties to individuals who may not be qualified to handle evidence or determine what constitutes child pornography. Supporters say reporting mandates for photo labs have proven effective, and that similar laws for IT workers will help combat child pornography on the Internet.
PLEASE NOTE: The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) serves state legislators and their staff. This site provides comparative information only and should not be construed as legal advice. NCSL cannot provide assistance with individual cases.
State Statutes (Excerpts) at link.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A depraved world: FBI agents wage a stressful battle against child pornography [View all]
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2012
OP
I can not imagine doing that work. Quite an article there, my heart goes out to those agents.
uppityperson
Dec 2012
#2
my brother had to watch child rape videos, so they could count how many acts to charge the abuser
bettyellen
Dec 2012
#10
he really wasn't ready or trained for something like this, although I don't know if you could be
bettyellen
Dec 2012
#32
my brother is the devil because he's a policeman? Um, no. He's one of the kindest do-gooder types I
bettyellen
Dec 2012
#31
thanks, that misanthropic B+W thinking ain't going to convince anyone to be an anarchist
bettyellen
Dec 2012
#39
it creeps me out that "normal" guys get excited over grown women dressed like school girls
Skittles
Dec 2012
#17
And why are mass shootings usually committed by men? Is there a relationship?
SharonAnn
Dec 2012
#37
Sometimes this is the only way to lock the perps up. If their victim is disabled, unable to testify,
freshwest
Dec 2012
#7
He was objecting to anti-child porn laws and has a substantial knowledge of what
geek tragedy
Dec 2012
#52
A strong rebuttal could be written. Providing sources requires effort & time, I decided against it.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2012
#55
Im not comparing crimes, im talking about how badly crime is fought in the United States
davidn3600
Dec 2012
#56
Yes, I think it's often abuse victims that become abusers themselves.
freedom fighter jh
Dec 2012
#27
I think it has to do with objectifying people in general, as well as mental disorders.
Dash87
Dec 2012
#59
What's your point? That destroying a child's soul and mind aren't as important?
WinkyDink
Dec 2012
#23
No, of course not. But literal survival of the living person must be at least equally important.
Loudly
Dec 2012
#30
55 fuckin % increase in one year. so damn tired of pro porn arguing there is no problem.
seabeyond
Dec 2012
#42
PITTSBURGH MAG/ JAN 2013/ "TAKEN" provides a glimpse into official opposition to PROTECT bill in PA.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2012
#50
The FBI is also trying to suppress advanced anonomizing technology as part of this
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#70
This vile case turns out to involve forum discussion about actual children related to a participant.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2013
#80