Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

yardwork

(69,352 posts)

8. WTAF!!

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Aug 27, 2025, 07:52 PM

Aug 2025

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

berniesandersmittens LeftInTX

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Republicans investigate Wikipedia over allegations of organized bias [View all] BumRushDaShow Aug 2025 OP

The GQP once again fulfill their role as professional victims. groundloop Aug 2025 #1

Well you hildegaard28 Aug 2025 #2

This sounds like one of those accusations that is a confession. markodochartaigh Aug 2025 #3

An edit is needed ... please forgive me. Botany Aug 2025 #7

Bias Scarlet Begalas Aug 2025 #28

Jesus.Fucking.CHRIST. 50 Shades Of Blue Aug 2025 #4

It's as if they didn't control the whole government Klarkashton Aug 2025 #5

Klarkashton Scarlet Begalas Aug 2025 #29

When did the government get the power to regulate free speech on Wikipedia? bucolic_frolic Aug 2025 #6

Good point jfz9580m Aug 2025 #32

WTAF!! yardwork Aug 2025 #8

"truth has a liberal bias" Skittles Aug 2025 #9

They literally can't handle the truth. thought crime Aug 2025 #25

I subscribe to the GAB mailing list (strictly for amusement!) JawJaw Aug 2025 #31

Wikipedia articles have many authors bmichaelh Aug 2025 #10

Wikipedia shows the weakness of not having one overriding editor who has final say - of course, you hope that top editor Midwestern Democrat Aug 2025 #42

These people must be made out of fucking 200 year old glass or egg shells because these people chowder66 Aug 2025 #11

If you want to see what conservatives would do to wikapedia ThoughtCriminal Aug 2025 #12

Out of curiosity, I checked out Conservapedia occasionally in the past. Prof. Toru Tanaka Aug 2025 #14

ThoughtCriminal Scarlet Begalas Aug 2025 #30

It's a private enterprise. They can be as biased as they want. Vinca Aug 2025 #13

Maybe rwnj will realize after all these bogus investigations Marthe48 Aug 2025 #15

Unlikely. 8 investigations failed to convince them about Benghazi. nt Shipwack Aug 2025 #17

The endless 'investigations' are only meant to cripple us. DC courts are nearly travelingthrulife Aug 2025 #38

I was being snotty Marthe48 Aug 2025 #40

This phrase makes little sense. Shipwack Aug 2025 #16

I take it hildegaard28 Aug 2025 #27

How about turning over that Fox News rock? Zorro Aug 2025 #18

"Republicans investigate" Six117 Aug 2025 #19

Facts don't care about your feelings. Fuck their party and the fascist horse it rode in on. Karasu Aug 2025 #20

"Truth has a liberal bias" Jack Valentino Aug 2025 #21

Yep. We all know as much, but their entire "anti-bias" crusade is just an attempt to rework all of reality to fit the Karasu Aug 2025 #24

Some of us--- or rather most of THEM, but not US... Jack Valentino Aug 2025 #41

If there is one thing Mace needs, it's organized bias, she only had 8 people show up for her rally. Uncle Joe Aug 2025 #22

I hope the Wikipedia folks reply is .... mwooldri Aug 2025 #23

They're playing to the base, and I mean base.(NT) The Wizard Aug 2025 #26

Any bias I've seen on Wikipedia has generally been Republicans or dodgy business types covering up their own misdeeds muriel_volestrangler Aug 2025 #33

The GOP excels at "projection". BumRushDaShow Aug 2025 #34

They'll have a gaggle of Mar-a-Lardo ladies look over the website wolfie001 Aug 2025 #35

Well, there goes that source. orangecrush Aug 2025 #36

Comer needs to find a different hobby. emulatorloo Aug 2025 #37

He should go back to farming. travelingthrulife Aug 2025 #39