Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thesquanderer

(13,114 posts)
8. Yes, they could only give them back to the importer who paid them in the first place.
Mon Sep 8, 2025, 07:42 AM
Sep 2025

Only the importer would have the ability to know how much was passed along to their customers, on which purchases. They would be in a position to at least theoretically provide refunds, but I doubt there's any realistic way to compel them to do so. Moreover, the importer likely did not sell directly to the final consumer, so there could be one ore more additional links in the chain that could have marked up the cost accordingly before reaching the consumer. So yeah... it's a mess, and the consumer is the likely loser.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Only half of the stolen money? Old Crank Sep 2025 #1
Probably because BumRushDaShow Sep 2025 #2
There were already legal tariffs. Maybe the net result of the new tariffs so far was double the revenue. thesquanderer Sep 2025 #7
I know this game. I used to live in NYC. Walleye Sep 2025 #3
NO... 2naSalit Sep 2025 #4
How much will Trump pay the Supreme Court to vote his way on the tariff issue? Irish_Dem Sep 2025 #5
I know of six pairs of hands that will be extended. joshdawg Sep 2025 #11
They've already been paid. rubbersole Sep 2025 #15
The money has to keep rolling in for them. Irish_Dem Sep 2025 #21
WHO will they refund? groundloop Sep 2025 #6
Yes, they could only give them back to the importer who paid them in the first place. thesquanderer Sep 2025 #8
Drop all of the prices on necessities back to pre-Covid levels Marthe48 Sep 2025 #14
😂 rubbersole Sep 2025 #16
It's what I am Marthe48 Sep 2025 #20
You're wonderful! rubbersole Sep 2025 #23
Thank you Marthe48 Sep 2025 #25
Yep.......... Lovie777 Sep 2025 #9
re: ""If the court says it, we'd have to do it." - This may be the first time those words were ever uttered by thesquanderer Sep 2025 #10
That was my first thought too when I saw that BumRushDaShow Sep 2025 #13
Good. Maybe you won't be so foolish and lawless next time. travelingthrulife Sep 2025 #12
Not really. cstanleytech Sep 2025 #18
We get double fucked then as we already paid higher prices and then big business gets more money returned to them. cstanleytech Sep 2025 #17
Give it back, that is just to damn bad. republianmushroom Sep 2025 #19
Hopefully Rebl2 Sep 2025 #22
I am foregoing a lot of things I want... ProudMNDemocrat Sep 2025 #24
The Lutnick family, Trump Tariff, Cantor Fitzgerald refund scheme: sop Sep 2025 #26
No not half Figarosmom Sep 2025 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bessent: US would have to...»Reply #8