Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(180,616 posts)
4. Judge strikes down Trump's $15bn lawsuit against the New York Times
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 12:25 PM
Sep 2025

Judge says US president’s complaint that the newspaper is ‘spreading false content’ about him violates federal rule

Judge strikes down Trump’s bn lawsuit against the New York Times

The Guardian (@theguardian.com) 2025-09-19T16:19:37Z

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/19/trump-nyt-lawsuit-judge-ruling

A US judge on Friday struck down Donald Trump’s $15bn lawsuit against the New York Times newspaper and some of its individual journalists. The judge gave the US president leave to amend the action, however, a court filing showed.

The judge in the case said that Trump’s complaint violated a federal rule requiring “a short plain statement” of the claim in an attempt to demonstrate that the plaintiff deserves relief.

Trump launched the massive lawsuit earlier this week accusing the major US publication of being a “mouthpiece” for the Democratic party and of “spreading false and defamatory content” about him.

On Friday the court said such a complaint is not a public forum “for vituperation and invective” or a protected platform “to rage against an adversary”.

The filing against the Times, the latest demonstration of the president’s willingness to use legal action against the media, was made by Trump’s lawyers to a district court in Florida on Monday night.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A federal judge just sumamrily struck Trump's complaint against the New York Times, calling it, essentially, garbage LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #1
🤔 dweller Sep 2025 #2
What did I tell ya? Ocelot II Sep 2025 #3
I share your opinion on this crap lawsuit LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #5
I'm not a lawyer but I agree. tinymontgomery Sep 2025 #22
NYT didn't even file a motion to strike the complaint. The judge acted sua sponte. rsdsharp Sep 2025 #27
Again, as a non-lawyer, can NYT now go after him? tinymontgomery Sep 2025 #35
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 requires that a pleading, rsdsharp Sep 2025 #42
Thank you. Much easier to understand now. n/t tinymontgomery Sep 2025 #47
What is your prediction, does trump replead or appeal to the 11th Circuit and then to SCOTUS? LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #23
It's not an appealable order. They will have to refile their complaint in compliance with Rule 8 Ocelot II Sep 2025 #25
Judge strikes down Trump's $15bn lawsuit against the New York Times LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #4
Read the whole order; it's glorious. Ocelot II Sep 2025 #6
I love this opinion LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #7
Yes, it is Marthe48 Sep 2025 #9
spank! Kali Sep 2025 #12
Uh oh Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2025 #8
He should charge them with contempt of court. Wonder Why Sep 2025 #10
If the revised complaint isn't cleaned up, the lawyers are subject to sanctions - Ocelot II Sep 2025 #33
Judge Merryday for U.S. Supreme Court, just as soon as possible. (nt) Paladin Sep 2025 #11
He'll be 75 in about six weeks, and already on senior status. rsdsharp Sep 2025 #39
Aww, poor Donny ain't getting his $15 Billion. ProudMNDemocrat Sep 2025 #13
He will re-file consistent with the court's decision. I still think he'll lose on the merits. onenote Sep 2025 #18
Will Trump let his lawyers file a new complaint that doesn't also include Ocelot II Sep 2025 #28
Yes. And a lot of the bullshit that will be pulled from the complaint onenote Sep 2025 #30
As long as the attachments are more stupid photos Ocelot II Sep 2025 #31
Yes. But the judge would've ignored most of that shit anyway. It was only included to stroke Trump's ego onenote Sep 2025 #38
Oh noes! Diaper Donny has a sad!... Aristus Sep 2025 #14
Was just listening to George Conway's podcast this morning about this ... ificandream Sep 2025 #15
The case hasn't been thrown out - yet - but the judge told Trump Ocelot II Sep 2025 #32
I had only seen the headline when I wrote that ificandream Sep 2025 #43
What a great name - Merryday! PatSeg Sep 2025 #16
I started to read it.... reACTIONary Sep 2025 #36
In that case, PatSeg Sep 2025 #44
"decidedly improper and impermissible" elleng Sep 2025 #17
I wouldn't get too excited about this ruling. onenote Sep 2025 #19
It is not easy to violate Rule 8 LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #21
The question is whether the revised complaint will comply with Rule 8. Ocelot II Sep 2025 #26
The new page limit doesn't include attachments. onenote Sep 2025 #29
As long as Rule 8's "short and plain statement of the case" is complied with, Ocelot II Sep 2025 #34
Exactly. But getting the judge to pay attention to it was never the point of the crap onenote Sep 2025 #37
No doubt. I just wonder whether Himself will be satisfied Ocelot II Sep 2025 #40
Why wouldn't he? He'll just publicly say that all that crap was part of his lawsuit. onenote Sep 2025 #41
I hope that the next filing at least state a real cause of action LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #45
Already? Oeditpus Rex Sep 2025 #20
MaddowBlog-Judge rejects Trump's case against The New York Times, tells lawyers to rewrite it LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #24
Here is trump's reaction to this ruling by the trial court LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #46
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge strikes down Trump'...»Reply #4