Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,437 posts)
31. Deadline Legal Blog-After he tried to avoid it, Trump now asks Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 05:14 PM
Sep 2025

The administration had previously urged the justices to rule only on a procedural issue in the case, not the merits of the issue.

After he tried to avoid it, Trump now asks Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship - MSNBC apple.news/AYGjPgS6YQBG...

(@oc88.bsky.social) 2025-09-29T20:14:56.977Z

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/birthright-citizenship-trump-supreme-court-rcna234469

The Trump administration has urged the Supreme Court to rule quickly on several of its policy priorities in President Donald Trump’s second term — and it has been fairly successful in doing so. Yet, when it comes to Trump’s birthright citizenship order, the administration has taken a more leisurely approach that suggests a lack of confidence in what even this Supreme Court would say if pressed to rule on the order’s legality.

But now the administration has finally asked the high court to weigh in on the merits of Trump’s order, which effectively aimed to unilaterally rewrite the Constitution, law and precedent — or at the very least, the long-held understanding of those things.....

The high court majority issued the procedural ruling the administration wanted in June. But that still left open the underlying question of the order’s legality. After losing the latest round of litigation again in the lower courts, the administration has now returned to the justices, asking them to “confirm the original meaning of the Citizenship Clause.” That clause of the 14th Amendment, which has long been understood to grant automatic citizenship to people born on U.S. soil, says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Again, the administration could have asked for such a ruling months ago, instead of first seeking the procedural ruling it pressed in Trump v. CASA. The administration has not been shy about ringing up the justices when it has felt the need to do so. In any event, we are now closer to the justices finally deciding the matter. The plaintiffs, who’ve been winning in the lower courts, will have a chance to weigh in before the justices consider whether and when to take it up.

The prior SCOTUS ruling was procedural to block nationwide injunctions in most cases. trump was hoping that the procedural ruling from SCOTUS would require each and every court to have to rule on the birthright citizenship issue. However, the plaintiffs were anticipating the SCOTUS narrow procedural ruling and converted most of the cases into class actions. There are now more than a couple courts who have ruled in class actions that trump's birthright citizenship position is void and these cases are nationwide injunctions and so now trump is asking for a ruling on the merits of trump's bizarre reading of the 14th Amendment.

I think that trump's position on the 14th Amendment is very weak and hopefully Roberts will NOT rewrite the 14th Amendment to make trump happy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

True, but he owns Bettie Sep 2025 #1
I hope they send me to Scotland or Ireland, then. C Moon Sep 2025 #12
They can send Donnie with you to Scotland, where his mother came from IronLionZion Sep 2025 #16
Why thank you. :o C Moon Sep 2025 #19
So that means Barron montanacowboy Sep 2025 #2
Per Reuters, Bayard Sep 2025 #4
You sure about that? Prairie Gates Sep 2025 #18
What? Bayard Sep 2025 #24
But his mother was "an illegal" BumRushDaShow Sep 2025 #28
You sure about that? Prairie Gates Sep 2025 #29
She was not. mgardener Sep 2025 #8
You called it! homegirl Sep 2025 #23
It doesn't matter Bayard Sep 2025 #30
No, you can't do that dipshit Bayard Sep 2025 #3
The Constitution also plainly states that... Shipwack Sep 2025 #15
Hopefully, the SCOTUS will reject this silly attempt LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #5
This shouldn't even be an issue. J_William_Ryan Sep 2025 #6
It was also true of other cases. Igel Sep 2025 #7
SC: "Of course Your Highness! Why even ask?" C Moon Sep 2025 #9
Is this retroactive,? What a nightmare. What about all the Russian women who came here to have their babies? Srkdqltr Sep 2025 #10
DOGE & Palantir have the data. TommyT139 Sep 2025 #13
Good lord dweller Sep 2025 #11
Absurd Cirsium Sep 2025 #14
The corrupt Supreme Cort will merely do Trump's bidding Prairie Gates Sep 2025 #17
It's sad we have a majority on the court that's not so supreme. mdbl Sep 2025 #20
Their goddam job is to tell Krasnov MLWR Sep 2025 #21
WHO'S FIRS TO GO? homegirl Sep 2025 #22
See post #4 Bayard Sep 2025 #25
If shithole asks JBTaurus83 Sep 2025 #26
IOW, Trump asks SCOTUS to rule The Constitution unconstitutional, no_hypocrisy Sep 2025 #27
Deadline Legal Blog-After he tried to avoid it, Trump now asks Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump asks Supreme Court ...»Reply #31