Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,298 posts)
21. And yet another dismissal of the intent behind the headline
Tue Nov 4, 2025, 06:40 AM
Nov 2025

From the order -

To date, the district court has not ruled or con-
ducted any other further proceedings on the pending motions.
Accordingly, Petitioners have established undue delay in res-
olution of their motions


It's a "slam" given the history of this case, the Appellate court that handed it down, and the fact that the order was so brief, without any extensive explanations or equivocating.

Kicking it down the road to allow for resolution seems standard to minimize overrule for not allowing enough time to resolve what has already dragged on for many months (knowing there is classified info involved), should it be appealed to the SCOTUS.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Loose Cannon know SCROTUS will back her up and nothing will ever come out. chicoescuela Nov 2025 #1
"But if I release it, he wont nominate me for johnnyfins Nov 2025 #2
Ugh... progressoid Nov 2025 #3
It IS a jole. Too bad this admin makes the joke johnnyfins Nov 2025 #16
Correction: SCROTUS! debsy Nov 2025 #6
.. johnnyfins Nov 2025 #15
Appeals Court should threaten Cannon with state bar discipline, no_hypocrisy Nov 2025 #4
Obstructing justice The Wizard Nov 2025 #5
But, Cannon has been given 60 days to comply!!---if she does not do so by then, they would riversedge Nov 2025 #13
Can she appeal this? Akakoji Nov 2025 #7
So they gave her 60 days to comply. Grins Nov 2025 #8
She won't. Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #11
My guess: she will comply with the order. And she'll probably deny the motion seeking release of the report. onenote Nov 2025 #20
Sure Polybius Nov 2025 #24
Why does she need ANY time? Bluetus Nov 2025 #12
Jail prevents him Polybius Nov 2025 #17
Please cite the law that says this. Bluetus Nov 2025 #18
LOCK HER UP!!!!! BurnDoubt Nov 2025 #9
Will to bet is doesn't happen. republianmushroom Nov 2025 #10
She should be impeached. yellow dahlia Nov 2025 #14
Yet another misleading story from Raw Story. onenote Nov 2025 #19
And yet another dismissal of the intent behind the headline BumRushDaShow Nov 2025 #21
"Lightly criticized " onenote Nov 2025 #22
As you have probably seen BumRushDaShow Nov 2025 #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Undue': Judge Cannon sla...»Reply #21