Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Dems introduce high-capacity magazine ban in the House [View all]GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)6. No, his magazine jammed.
His mag held 33 rounds. Plus one in the chamber is 34 rounds. The FBI said that he fired 31 rounds. He still had three. Among gunners it is well known that extreme hi-capacity magazines are prone to failure-to-feed malfunctions. The follower spring is not able to maintain pressure on the ammunition over its range of travel. His mag jammed and he was trying to clear the jam which gave others the chance to jump him.
The Batman movie killer's super sized mag also jammed.
The Luby's killer, and the VT killer used standard magazines and reloaded, with no jams.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As carrying spare mags isn't a problem, there shouldn't be any arguement against this bill
Kaleva
Jan 2013
#18
Well then great, let's get rid of the high capacity clips because it doesn't make a difference.
ProgressoDem
Jan 2013
#43
Another bill proposed to show they are for Gun Control, knowing it will never see the light of day
happyslug
Jan 2013
#20
Well, as soon as I get the bill number, I'll be calling and writing my rep asking him to co-sponser
Kaleva
Jan 2013
#22