Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Dems introduce high-capacity magazine ban in the House [View all]Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)7. Lots of practice
under ideal conditions, stress, adrenaline and other factors make it harder to accomplish such a feat. reading other responses, it seems like people want higher capacity magazines because they are more prone to jamming. if they had to reload 5 times before firing 30 rounds, there are a lot more opportunies for something to go wrong, and they can't carry as many rounds on them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As carrying spare mags isn't a problem, there shouldn't be any arguement against this bill
Kaleva
Jan 2013
#18
Well then great, let's get rid of the high capacity clips because it doesn't make a difference.
ProgressoDem
Jan 2013
#43
Another bill proposed to show they are for Gun Control, knowing it will never see the light of day
happyslug
Jan 2013
#20
Well, as soon as I get the bill number, I'll be calling and writing my rep asking him to co-sponser
Kaleva
Jan 2013
#22