Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Dems introduce high-capacity magazine ban in the House [View all]GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)41. Turns good ammo into noise with few hits on target center.
Last edited Fri Jan 4, 2013, 02:50 PM - Edit history (2)
Video #2: At that distance all the shots should hit in one large ragged hole. Instead they are scattered all over the paper, few in the bull, and some that completely missed the paper. Slower speed, better aim, is far more deadly.
Video #5: They don't show how he did, but his technique was good, and he had an optical sight, nicknamed a "red dot" sight. His shots probably chewed a single hole in the target. Not as fast, but far more deadly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As carrying spare mags isn't a problem, there shouldn't be any arguement against this bill
Kaleva
Jan 2013
#18
Well then great, let's get rid of the high capacity clips because it doesn't make a difference.
ProgressoDem
Jan 2013
#43
Another bill proposed to show they are for Gun Control, knowing it will never see the light of day
happyslug
Jan 2013
#20
Well, as soon as I get the bill number, I'll be calling and writing my rep asking him to co-sponser
Kaleva
Jan 2013
#22