Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(164,909 posts)
2. "And...?"
Tue Dec 9, 2025, 10:06 AM
Dec 9
?

?


And he was slapped down by the D.C. Court of Appeals (by a 3-judge panel and the en banc review upheld the halt, but allowed more fact-finding to proceed - Appeals court declines to reinstate order finding 'probable cause exists' to hold Trump officials in criminal contempt (Nov. 14, 2025)

(snip)

Nearly three months ago, a three-judge panel of the appeals court wiped away Boasberg’s contempt ruling from April. Now, the entire appeals court has decided to keep that ruling intact. But the court’s decision does not fully tie Boasberg’s hands. Because of the way the appeals court ruled this summer – and the court’s decision on Friday to not disturb that ruling – Boasberg is able to move forward with his fact-finding inquiry around the officials involved in the matter, and several members of the court went out of their way to make that point clear Friday.

(snip)




(that's why I try to include references to the previous history of the stories )

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge orders top DOJ atto...»Reply #2