Latest Breaking News

FakeNoose

(40,378 posts)

6. They were cash transactions, and there were supposed to be SARS written up for each one

Fri Dec 19, 2025, 10:32 PM

Dec 19

SARS = Suspicious Activity Reports, the banks are supposed to report any unexplained cash deposit or withdrawal over $10,000. Chase let Epstein go for years without any SARS written, until he was arrested in 2019. Suddenly Chase knew they had a problem, and they had to backdate a bunch of reports.

Some banks were reluctant to handle Epstein's transactions, and probably/maybe that's why he made many large deposits and withdrawals with Russian banks. There's still a lot we don't know, obviously.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Epstein money trail: Lawsuits claim major banks enabled Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking finances [View all] BumRushDaShow Dec 19 OP

His picture will be turned to the wall. hedda_foil Dec 19 #1

Why would banks fund child sex trafficking? Irish_Dem Dec 19 #2

If it brings in money and profit, why wouldn't they? slightlv Dec 19 #3

A good investment and the bankers are part of the sex ring. Irish_Dem Dec 19 #4

Yip, dream all we want... slightlv Dec 19 #5

Could he have been taping porn? Rape Porn. Irish_Dem Dec 20 #8

They were cash transactions, and there were supposed to be SARS written up for each one FakeNoose Dec 19 #6

Yes but we can speculate. Why would a bank refuse to do SARs? Irish_Dem Dec 20 #7

Deutsch Bank. Let's see how Trump financed the sex trafficking business. travelingthrulife Dec 20 #9