Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

DallasNE

(7,947 posts)

4. Wouldn't They Only Redact The Face Of The Victim

Reply to William Seger (Reply #2)

Mon Dec 22, 2025, 12:29 AM

14 hrs ago

If it is clearly a victim and not discard the entire photo? I mean, if it is a photo of Trump and a girl in a training bra, you only redact the girl's face. That is my understanding on how the law was written. What were the instructions to the lawyers?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rhiannon12866

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump Administration Live Updates: Justice Dept. Reposts Epstein Files Image Showing Trump Picture [View all] mahatmakanejeeves 20 hrs ago OP

Oops! Aussie105 18 hrs ago #1

That's admitting they pulled it the first time because they thought it showed #rump with VICTIMS William Seger 17 hrs ago #2

THIS !!!! Talitha 16 hrs ago #3

Wouldn't They Only Redact The Face Of The Victim DallasNE 14 hrs ago #4

That's what I mean -- if they were following the law, they would have just censored the faces William Seger 6 hrs ago #6

This message was self-deleted by its author William Seger 6 hrs ago #5