Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(165,272 posts)
Sat Dec 27, 2025, 11:09 AM 7 hrs ago

An AI pioneer says the technology is 'limited' and won't replace humans anytime soon [View all]

Source: NBC News

Dec. 27, 2025, 6:00 AM EST


NEW YORK — When Andrew Ng talks about AI, people listen — in classrooms, boardrooms and Silicon Valley. The researcher-turned-educator-turned-investor has become an AI statesman of sorts, co-founding Google Brain, which became part of Google’s flagship DeepMind division that now produces some of the world’s best AI systems, and serving as Chief Scientist of Chinese tech titan Baidu.

In today’s influencer-obsessed information landscape, Ng’s biggest claim to fame might be his credential as a “Top Voice” on LinkedIn, an honor the platform gives to a select few handpicked experts, with over 2.3 million followers.

Armed with decades of AI experience, Ng says he remains clear-eyed about AI’s abilities. “The tricky thing about AI is that it is amazing and it is also highly limited,” Ng told NBC News in an interview on the sidelines of his AI Developers Conference in November. “And understanding that balance of how amazing and how limited it is, that’s difficult.”

Over the past few years, generative AI has attracted hundreds of billions of dollars in investment as nearly every major tech company has pivoted towards the industry’s hottest topic. But in the last several months, many have questioned whether the surging investment has created a bubble now at risk of bursting due to persistent issues like hallucinations, AI’s involvement in mental health crises and increased regulatory scrutiny.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/innovation/andrew-ng-says-ai-limited-wont-replace-humans-anytime-soon-rcna246074



It IS a bubble and the amount of resources being expended to create datacenters that will not have enough power to operate nor enough staff knowledgeable to maintain the hardware itself (with all the focus on software programmers), looks like a catastrophe in the making.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If it don't make pizza, it ain't worth nothing. /nt bucolic_frolic 7 hrs ago #1
Might I add that you can only divide the pie of potential users so far. There is no way all of these data flashman13 7 hrs ago #2
In the end I think what you'll see is Amazo, Microsoft and Google be the dominant three. cstanleytech 7 hrs ago #4
In the end the big guys will gobble up everyone else for pennies on the dollar. flashman13 6 hrs ago #5
Well I got agree there as when it comes to writing they are extremely limited. cstanleytech 7 hrs ago #3
Yep. not fooled 4 hrs ago #7
Even it's factual questions can be flawed so you should always verify as some Trump lawyers are learning right now. cstanleytech 2 hrs ago #14
So don't use AI for writing. Anything you write with it isn't your work anyway and can't be copyrighted. highplainsdem 3 hrs ago #11
I don't, I have tested it out though and it's just not at the point where it'll replace a human being. cstanleytech 2 hrs ago #13
One serious limit: AI bots are completely incapable of actual logic William Seger 6 hrs ago #6
While he's correct, it doesn't matter. Shipwack 4 hrs ago #8
AI isn't really that much intelligence (for now at least), it is automation on steroids ToxMarz 4 hrs ago #9
I heard the same thing from an industry insider mdbl 3 hrs ago #10
The venture capital bubble may burst, but that's not going to stop the research. LudwigPastorius 3 hrs ago #12
That article is nothing but pro-AI hype from someone incapable of being objective about AI. He's highplainsdem 2 hrs ago #15
I totally agree. When the IT revolution rolled in during the late 60s, early 70s/80s, we were just seeing the beginning SWBTATTReg 27 min ago #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»An AI pioneer says the te...