Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(40,905 posts)
2. I can understand the motivations behind this kind of training, but -- FIFTY HOURS ?? EVERY TWO YEARS ??
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 01:31 AM
3 hrs ago

That's a full work week, plus a working weekend. That's people giving up time from their professional careers, and service to their patients, because someone, somewhere, thinks that's how much it takes. Does the burden really need to be so onerous ? And shouldn't the need for reinforcement decline after you've been through the training already ? This is the kind of thing that leads to charges of "government overreach" seeming plausible.

Proponents need to go back to the drawing board, and come up with some peer-reviewed, certified analysis of the level of training credibly needed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Doctors' effort to end bi...»Reply #2