Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Shipwack

(3,015 posts)

17. This is wrong on several levels, but...

Reply to AZProgressive (Original post)

Tue Jan 6, 2026, 02:14 PM

Jan 6

What bothers me most is what happens when they fit the facts to their conclusions.

A competent plan would be to slowly transition the women out of their roles, over a period of a few years. This would ensure no issues with readiness, and ensure stability.

Instead, I’m betting that SecDef Cockwaffle is going to immediately kick out every woman in a combat role out of the military (or at least out of their rating) without any plan for replacing them. Readiness will be compromised for years.

Putin’s long term investment pays off once again.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

AZProgressive

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pentagon will begin review of 'effectiveness' of women in ground combat positions [View all] AZProgressive Jan 6 OP

Molly Pitcher is waiting /nt bucolic_frolic Jan 6 #1

Hegseth Under Fire for Saying 'Women Don't Belong in Combat - Liberal Lens 8/4/2025 Rhiannon12866 Jan 6 #2

Well, neither do you, Kegseth! OldBaldy1701E Jan 6 #5

TY, Rhi! Sen Warren is bringing it to Kegsbreath! Fierce! electric_blue68 Jan 6 #18

You can't make rank if you don't serve in combat. Irish_Dem Jan 6 #3

Here we go. sinkingfeeling Jan 6 #4

Given the current leaders in the DOJ, we can all write the results of this study now. Lonestarblue Jan 6 #6

If the Institute for Defense Analyses didn't recommend firing Kegseth after the Signal chat stupidity... William Seger Jan 6 #7

Are we heading back to the 1990s? nitpicked Jan 6 #8

No more women in the military is Project 25s goal. BradBo Jan 6 #9

Yes, it is lonely bird Jan 6 #11

A personal experience AverageOldGuy Jan 6 #10

Thank you for that lonely bird Jan 6 #12

I don't have a problem with women in combat arms... RetiredParatrooper Jan 6 #13

Hey col. Joni Ernst DonCoquixote Jan 6 #14

New uniform for women in combat Bayard Jan 6 #15

Rolling back all progressive gains, one at a time. Munu Jan 6 #16

This is wrong on several levels, but... Shipwack Jan 6 #17